Posted:
The producers may have to do some (more) homework!! >:
1. Muskaan is an NGO that runs a training centre for adults (16-50 years old) with an intellectual disability. What was the idea of involving them or at least their name in a racket of child kidnapping?? 😕
2. DD was shot presumably in the arm or shoulder but no sign showed up in that area. Instead she had a temple wound that showed up bleeding heavily in one scene, less in the next, and again heavily (but in a fresh red colour) in the third (whereas by then, it should have shown a darkish red/brown considering the time lapse and physiology of the wound).
A bit of research on the effect of a gun shot would have helped...
3. DD apparently does not have much money. How could she have bought such expensive looking cycles for her and her nephew?
Besides, what else does she use as a professional detective except for her laptop, white gloves, and lunch pouches, to solve the city's crime cases - that too, single-handed.?
4. Can one really change the traffic lights on the main traffic artery of Rajpath by fiddling with some wires in a box? Then ruffians and urchins would have plunged that area in the dark long ago...😆
These are not observations for the sake of cribbing. Problem is we are dealing here with a story that is situated in the capital of the country, not some obscure village or fictitious city. And some people know this city in and out.
The location poses restrictions on the amount of fiction one wishes to infuse in the show. It also demands that whatever one wishes to show for real, should look real.
And they should keep in mind that portrayal of the police force in the national capital is as much a matter of dignity as portraying something on the armed forces of the country.
Let's hope and wish that the producers and creative team stay alert on these issues. 😛
The 50
Anupamaa
