True. In all this he dragged Shiv into it while it is Brahma who gave Narakasur the boon . I know he has no respect for our culture,heritage in general and epics in particular. I know he is least bothered about the Devine charecters and their dignity while penning his story. I wish one day he will learn the lesson in a harder way.Originally posted by: KrishnaPriyaa
You are right again. All those versions are acceptable.
But what UN did was INSULT. Insult to every God and Goddess, especially LakshmiNarayana and ParvatiShiva. While writing it from Shakta philosophy is fine, there must be some sort of coherent thought to it. Writing Narakasura kidnapping Mahalakshmi, who is Aadi Shakti as well is very wrong. While Sita Haran is different, here Lakshmi is the Para Brahma Swaroopini. It is a grave insult to her, as well as to Mahadeva. Lakshmi, who in my view point is like Mahadeva's sister- how will He give her to Narakasura? UN has depicted it wrong. Additionally, Lakshmi is not ONLY fortune/wealth.