Characterization in the show

I am hooked to this show for multiple reasons... one of the reasons is focus on characterization

Like Mahabharata all the characters are grey .. some more black than white but every one is wrong at some point and wronged at some other point of the story , each character is governed by one primary trait and play The game with that trait ... it's either greed , rigidity, pride , impulse , Jealousy , anger or , fear

Vikram( Bhishma) rigidity to mend his traditions he doesn't want to see beyond
Satrupa ( Kunti )pride in her one child that she forgot about her other child
Baldev (dridarastra)jealous of his wife position to lack of confidence in taking any decision
Narottam( karna) fear to lose his only relationship his mother
Anami impulse like Abhimanyu she knows to enter the chakravyuh.. she wants to fight but she isn't prepared fully
Pujan Greed
Sudha (shakuni anger I think )I find her most interesting becuase I can't see any trait yet .. she's cold , she's disgusting, manupulative. but I don't know if it's anger or greed
Every one plays to their strength and their strength is their weakness too

Every one has a story and the hero depends on whose story you are
Listening


Every one wants peace and they have different ways of attaining peace ... revenge for sudha to wealth for pujan to fulfilling the guilt by getting Anami her right for satrupa

Narottam karna??????

As per I know the writer or someone in RKC thought what if karna was the female
That's how he find his female karna
I found anami mixture with karna Abhimanyu

& narottam somehow duryadhan

It's only my thought

Brilliant post 👏
Yes even I love Sudha's characterisation.
Infact all the characters have been brilliantly written and portrayed.

Originally posted by: RB.ritz

Narottam karna??????

As per I know the writer or someone in RKC thought what if karna was the female
That's how he find his female karna
I found anami mixture with karna Abhimanyu

& narottam somehow duryadhan

It's only my thought

Karna because his life was a struggle to prove himself in the fear of loss and loss of things which he never possessed ... he supported Duryodhan despite his sins and against his conscience becuase he was the only person who supported karna when every one else rejected him ... Duryodhan did it for his own benifit like sudha here ... hence the parallel

Narottam knows he's wrong to cheat Anami but he still He does that trying to prove his loyality to him mother ... very well exploited by sudha

I actually don't see much of parallel between karna and Anami ... again my interpretation.. the writers could have thought of something else

Originally posted by: manya_roy

Brilliant post 👏
Yes even I love Sudha's characterisation.
Infact all the characters have been brilliantly written and portrayed.

Thanks 😃
Sudha is mysterious , cold , manupulative and disgusting all at once
She's so focused that she doesn't show any signs of empathy or emotions even to her som ... it's a rare
Portrayal.. the actress is brilliant too

T I differ with your characterization.

Originally posted by: -Bhavi

T I differ with your characterization.

Pujan is more like Shakuni.

Narottam is the Shikhandi. Although Shikhandi's shield was used by Arjun here its Sudha (Gandhari) who is using it for her own cause.

Sudha is the Gandhari here who has chosen to put a blind fold on her eye in the name of revenge.

Karna is Anami - Who was abandoned at the birth and again at 17 had to leave her family. Like Karna she too is supporting the enemy (Narottam and Sudha). Yet she fights for truth. She is feerless and helps all who needs it or asks for it.

I am not yet sure if I call Narottam as Shikhandi or Duryodhan?

Hey :-)
Beauty of Maharashtra is that as many readers those many interpretations

My drawing parallel is based on the character trait rather than situation and yours based on situation hence the difference

Like pujan ... he's greedy he wants to have the empire to himself while shakuni the underlying emotion was anger ... Shakuni wanted to distroy The empire that killed his family and tricked his father into marrying off his daughter to a blind prince

Ghadari ... excess of anything is bad her basic traitwas loyality ... she was extremely loyal to her husband and son that she never went against them ...sudha on the other hand shows no traits of loyality... what we see is a undying anger...that's my reason for comparing with Shakuni

Karna although a lot of interpretation find him the lost son ... and sympathise with him ... karna was very insecure through out his life ... his was trying to protect what he never had please read my explaination above for karna

Anami on the other hand is very secure ... in fact very childishly
Secure ... like the Abhimanyu who jumped into the

Shikandi denotes will power she was born to be a method to end Bhishma...

Again purely my interpretation of Mahabharata rather than RKc

Very nice post and awesome thought placed on character.

Originally posted by: mayuri099

Very interesting analysis!

Thanks 😊

Originally posted by: tellyme

Very nice post and awesome thought placed on character.

Actually even I wanted to say in some post ...no one is villain ... they are all plying games toachieve what they want...everyone is trying to get what they don't have or what they think they have been cheated with.

Sudha has her own reason to play games with LM..She felt she was cheated . LM itself has cheated on many... it was villain for them and if you play games it will definitely come back to you...

Baldev was villain for Deeru when he was sent to Jail for no reason... andnow when he plays game against them he is doing right for his badla but Villian for LM...

such are all cases...

yes Anami isunprepared for chakravyue and entered it... and thishasstrike to Satrupa and she will prepare her for Chakravyue by Education.

Again Loved your analysis.

Thank you 😊

I am actually surprised with the right story line ..every single character is a victim and an offender too depending on the situation ... I really like the education track .. it's just the right decision to broaden Anamis views

Although it doesn't make satrupa any less wrong becuase her reason for sending her to college somewhere is to convince Vikram and the world of anamis worth .. every parent does that but most parent earn the right to take decisions too ... atleast one step in a positive direction