Face of truth- Satrupa - Page 2

Originally posted by: Arshi67

Res

************

The difference between nature and nurture being played out in front of us in the quest for proof of apnapan. Dil se mehsoos karein ya sirf dimaag se soche.

We accept truths that are convenient for us in the moment. To set aside our ego and introspect and then accept our fallibilities is not within the capability of many. Satrupa gave away her girl child even though Guruji had said she should send the first born away. But the first born was a boy child. A truth she has conveniently set aside in her sense of righteous outrage of the present. Her outrage still continues to reek of selfishness.

So much about this show is goose bump inducing!

Originally posted by: Jhinka_Roy

Obviously, Satarupa is hardly without blame. No one had actually forced her to abandon one child in favour of another.

But if you spend years with elders who prove themselves to be staunch followers of traditions (in this case Vikram), you kind of anticipate how their reactions will be.

Satarupa knows her FiL very well. She was faced with the task of keeping one child with her, and sending away the other.
She was also warned by the Guruji that the child whom she would keep in Lal Mahaal will have the risk of dying. She was initially instructed to keep Vatsalya (the older twin) away from Lal Mahal, in which case the younger twin, who is a girl, would have been in the risk of losing her life and would never be accepted and brought up as the heir of Royal Steel (by Vikram) in spite of growing up in Lal Mahal. Satarupa would also be expected to try for a son again, whereas her and Baldev's relationship was probably already only in the name. So she took the easier route and provided Lal Mahal the heir Vikram wanted.

Here's a grandfather whose adherence to so-called propriety rendered his wife practically a suppresing bystander (even if Gayatri was a beloved wife and could possibly be a caring grandmother to Anami), his son forever bitter, and led his daughter--in-law to commit condemnable things. Not to mention creating wronged adversaries like Dhiraj and Pujan to some extent.

Anami has a long way to go to clear his mess.

Originally posted by: mira

I think Satrupa wouldnt have chosen between boy and girl, had she not been part of this family. She is flawed character, yes. But I dont think choosing a boy child was really her flaw. She wanted her position in family intact. And for that she wanted a boy. She knew it was wrong, but she is power hungry woman... or at least someone who want to win at all odds. So when she had to give up one child, she chose the one option that gives her the most upper hand.

She is a vicious and scary person ... but i really dont think she is sexist. Neither is she feminist.

I am ok with her questioning anyone else ... except Anami, I dont want Satrupa to bend knees in front of anyone 😛

Originally posted by: NavyaKavya30

👏Superb as always...

Oh yes...yes...100% YES to goosebumps with the power packed dialogues and the music ..I do get a feel of Bahubali music at times...