The extent of the Rakshas relationship

Page

Next Last

Poll

How far did it go?

QueenKordeilia

@QueenKordeilia

Dazzler

Posted: 7 years ago

So, this point has been raised in a few threads and I wanted to know what you all think.

How far do you think Rakshas went?

Edited by QueenKordeilia - 7 years ago

Quote

Frequent Posters

What's in a name?

@PemaKarpo

Dazzler

Posted: 7 years ago

I'm sure they've had sex.
Sakshi has always been pretty forceful as far as their relationship is concerned. She's always been sure that she's wanted him.
She would have thought having sex is a way of making sure that Raj never leaves her.
I don't think Raj would have ever really cared for their relationship. If he had, he wouldn't have left her and come off to Gaguwal and fallen in love with Preet and married her.
Sakshi must have sensed this and might have wanted to make their bond as strong as possible.
Now, I don't want to behave like these people who say that the girl is always the one who initiates a physical relationship. But in Sakshi's case, I am sure of this.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Preeti

@rani7131

Voyager

Posted: 7 years ago

I don't think that she had sex with him.

Quote

QueenKordeilia

@QueenKordeilia

Dazzler

Posted: 7 years ago

There must be some reason as to why SD believes she's entitled to Raj. Some women believe that if they've given themselves to a man, he should take responsibility for them.

Quote

QueenKordeilia

@QueenKordeilia

Dazzler

Posted: 7 years ago

But then there was that scene during Rakshas 'honeymoon' where Raj was uncomfortable when SD was trying to get close to him. Although, that could be attributed to his feelings for Preet rather than awkwardness at the thought of sleeping with SD.

Quote

What's in a name?

@PemaKarpo

Dazzler

Posted: 7 years ago

It could be because he was engaged to her.
But in today's world, even in India, I doubt if there are couples who are seeing each other, but haven't had sex. Very unlikely.
In most cases, it's understood.

Quote

QueenKordeilia

@QueenKordeilia

Dazzler

Posted: 7 years ago

Yeah, unless one belongs to a very traditional or religious family, you can't really expect engaged people not to have sex.

SD was definitely confident enough to tell Raj to kiss her in front of Preet. There was no shyness or hesitation when she said that. Kinda points to them having at least kissed in the past. And I doubt people would stop at kissing.

Quote

What's in a name?

@PemaKarpo

Dazzler

Posted: 7 years ago

That explains why Sakshi is made evil too.
In the serial world, girls who have sex before marriage are bitches, but it's okay for a guy to have pre marital sex.
After all Raman, whom Raj worships had pre marital sex. So why wouldn't he?
Unless Amrit had made him promise he would never 😆

Quote

QueenKordeilia

@QueenKordeilia

Dazzler

Posted: 7 years ago

Hmm... I don't know. Simran also had pre-marital sex but she's never been evil. She did receive a lot more flak than Raman for having a child out of wedlock, though. That's because it's easy for someone to deny paternity but maternity can't be denied.