If she had some love towards Chandra and if Pandugarth was really innocent and an halfwit ,her emotional plea with Chandra Gupta Maurya would have raised our sympathy
Even with out an iota of feeling or concern for Chandra, she plays with his weakness of his unbounded true love towards her
She indirectly threatens to go away from the palace with her "innocent'"pathetic brother to safe guard him from the evil forces .Even she asserted to Moora that her sole purpose to be in the mahal is Bindusara.
Rajat or Chandra are quite confused to act in the rajya Darbar scene
Chandra deserves our sympathetic compassion.The love inflicted samrat cannot see tears of his sweet heart and raised his voice against Acharya and refuted the long standing promise of obliterating Nandh Vansh
Finally Acharya's fear of a Raja falling in love comes true.both Chandra and Achrya excelled in their heated debate
It got off to a hairy start with their heated arguments about who is right...Acharya fulfilling the long pending oath OR Chandra as he proclaimed, stands on truth side
They clashed in a bad tempered debate that featured the disagreement on the fate of Pandugarth.The show down was the first one between Chandra and Acharya (is it real or faked to bring out the truth)
Apama has clearly succeeded to bring up the rift between Guru and disciple
But foolish Malay has revealed his identity while attempting the murder...this is to create further rift between Moora and Nandini.
Chandra is shown as a weakling and looks utterly confused.it is absolutely unacceptable.
All lead to domestic as well as political chaos.
Finally, Nandini, is the person to eliminate her priya baai.What is the prize of "LOVE?