Bahubali A Review- Maa Nishadha - Page 3

Originally posted by: shruthiravi

@aditi Devasena was a medium who bought out the issues in that family. Her character sketch was good and Anuskha is a fanastic actor. I dont know whether you have seen her Arundhathi. If not please watch.

Devasena's critical mistake was the second instance where she asks Amarendra to be the king while he is ripped of being army chieftan as first and third instance I dont think she could have acted otherwise. She is not mahanta ki moorat who will sacrifice and accept Bhalla Deva as her husband. Nor you can expect her to cow down when she is bought chained for punishing a man who was touching women inappropriately. But second instance she could have controlled her tongue. That second instance connects to 3rd and the free fall begins.

@Sanju Satyavati was a woman who wanted her sons to be the king. She orders Bhishma to bring princesses for the useless Vichitravirya who cant get a wife of his own. Here Shivgami doesnt have any ambition of seeing her son on the throne, she is happy to put bahubali. Second she asks bahubali to bring devasena only after she insults the proposal. She doesnt have the hunger of power like Satyavati, it is more Kaikeyi a woman of situations.

@Sandhya thanks dear. Yes Ramya Krishna it was performance of a life time.