Originally posted by: .annihilation.
I'm sorry to say but you're defying the definition of logic here when you say, 'forget what I'm saying'. Haven't I been talking to you all this while? 😆For instance, let's say a and b had an argument somewhere on the road and ended up beating each other, other people too join in assuming a or b to be correct and the fight escalates to great heights.You're suggesting the side which got highest number of supporters stands correct and the side with less number of supporters is automatically wrong.The correct logic, imo, would not be the count of supporters but to find out what the crux of the issue was and then apply appropriate measures to solve it. Only then can a or b declared to be right or wrong. It's important to know which and what logic to be applied when and where.I won't even get started with the whole Vandana-Maya issue here because clearly, you and I won't agree no matter what I explain and the way I do it. So, I'm done with this thread.Had actually intervened to put a stop to all of it but seeing that its not happening, I might as well make a graceful exit. 😃