Back with a bang and what a satisfying episode. - Page 14

Created

Last reply

Replies

136

Views

6.6k

Users

26

Likes

331

Frequent Posters

-poloenigma- thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
Sujata knows that her marriage has a legal standing. It was shown in episode 118 i guess as mentioned by a member. She kept quite for all these years because she didn't want his name , Atharv never wanted anything to do with his father...
If she felt that her marriage has no legal standing, she wouldn't have been able to give those bhaari bharkam dialogues to Suman. Why won't she have proof of her marriage? A marriage certificate isn't the only proof.

She spoke yesterday to give suman a reality check as Suman crossed all limits of bitchiness and lacked basic human decency to be respectful towards another human being.

If she felt that her marriage has no legal standing, she wouldn't say that 'I'm the legitimate wife of RK', she would simply say that I'm the 1st wife...RK never gave her a divorce so that makes Suman the illegitimate wife.

Just because Suji never claimed for her rights, DOES NOT mean that her marriage has no legal standing. We need to stop assuming the legality of the Su-Su-RK triangle as it has been ESTABLISHED by the CVs that Sujata is the legal wife and Suman, the mistress.
ViTharvforever thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
Common guys ur still asking y sujata didnt claim her rights earlier before 28yrs???u cant understand she made that sacrifice cz of blind love on ramakant...nt cz she dont have proof 4 marriage...u say anything just cz she is atharv's mom...u heard it from her ryt??she is the legal wyf of ramakant...n she meant that..didnt say to shut up suman...
even now she wont claim her rights if suman was silent...suman made her speak the truth...

N coming to ramakant he loved sujata oly...n his love 4 atharv was also shown so no way he will write a will giving all his property to ravish...no chance
Edited by ViTharvforever - 9 years ago
ViTharvforever thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: Karaali

Legality of marriage should have no impact on inheritance.

If Atharv can prove beyond doubt (like with genetic testing) that he is RK's son, he can claim his share of both ancestral property as well as RK's person property - even if there is a will. The will can be contested on the ground that the father did not want to declare the illegitimate child in front of the world.

I remember reading about some recent cases in India which brought about about the changes in the law and now give an equal share to the illegitimate child. If there are lawyers or student-lawyers on this forum, they can tell more about it.

I am not saying Atharv wants the property, I am talking about IF he wants the property!


The word illegtimate itself never fits for atharv anymore...so hel never need such clearance😆 as sujata said he is the legal heir of vashith house including kalindi's son...both r legitimate waaris of vashiths

N as yu said even the illegtimate children can have share in property..but not illegtimate wyf
Edited by ViTharvforever - 9 years ago
Karaali thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: ViTharvforever



The word illegtimate itself never fits for atharv anymore...so hel never need such clearance😆as sujata said he is the legal heir of vashith house including kalindi's son...both r legitimate waaris of vashiths

N as yu said even the illegtimate children can have share in property..but not illegtimate wyf



Not sure what you found hilarious. All I was saying that both guys have equal rights. Rest is for the courts to decide.
ViTharvforever thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: Karaali



Not sure what you found hilarious. All I was saying that both guys have equal rights. Rest is for the courts to decide.


yes even illegtimate children have share in property...but wyf doesnt...the way all vashiths are shut up now...its clear sujat is the legal wyf of ramakant
-poloenigma- thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
Even Dadaji's sister doesn't consider Suman as the bahu 🤣 The way she taunted Suman saying how finally there was at least 1 Vashisht Bahu in the house referring to Vividha 😆
And she adores Sujata...this proves their marriage wasn't a secret...otherwise Dadi has no reason to reject Suman as her bahu...Only the idiot Dadaji opposed Sujata-Ramakant marriage and forcibly got Ramu married to Suman..Dadi ji was like..Finally you are here...She was so happy to see Suji..this clears everything..
ViTharvforever thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: -poloenigma-

Even Dadaji's sister doesn't consider Suman as the bahu 🤣 The way she taunted Suman saying how finally there was at least 1 Vashisht Bahu in the house referring to Vividha 😆

And she adores Sujata...this proves their marriage wasn't a secret...otherwise Dadi has no reason to reject Suman as her bahu...Only the idiot Dadaji opposed Sujata-Ramakant marriage and forcibly got Ramu married to Suman..Dadi ji was like..Finally you are here...She was so happy to see Suji..this clears everything..


buaji found vv as vashith bahu..bt she was unable to bless R n V as a pair...cz Atharv interrupted...ofcourse vv is a vashith bahu n bua dadi will support vitharv once the truth is out unless cvs purposely spoil hr...am saying this by seeing her suppoting ramakant n sujata ...

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".