Do you agree with Tum Bin story ending?

Originally posted by: TheBoss

He was out partying and getting wasted and he was a bad driver who would put a chinese driver to shame. He narrowlly avoided hitting a girl and the dog, then hit a barricade and yet kept driving and plowed into the dude head on. Then he leaves him to die with his hit and run. To make it worse he makes the move on the his girl.

Did he really redeemed himself in the end? Was it fair that he evaded the law?

Originally posted by: bafflingtulip

No

Originally posted by: Nikhil718

I wouldn't call him bad driver. The main problem was the fire pipe falling over as there was to much water. This is the reason why he couldn't see properly while driving. Him running over that guy was an accident because like I said, there was to much water.

He felt bad running over that guy but I wouldn't put all the blame on him because it was an accident. If you've read my first paragraph, then you will understand where im coming from.

I don't think he deliberately attempted to make a move on his fiancee. I mean he liked her, but he was still gulity about what happened. His main purpose was to confess and ask for the family forgivness. Plus, to make sure their business stays on track as it was going downhill.

She liked him more than he liked her. The thing was that he scared to tell her what happened. It was the victims father who told her everything.

The ending was logical. He finally admited to her what happened but the suicide attempted shows how bad he felt. Police made it clear that the family need him more than the law, so there was no need to arrest him. It was an accident.

Originally posted by: TheBoss

Good post. But any driver who narrowly avoided an accident the first logical thing would be to then slow down but he contined on and then he drove into the barriace, you are right mayhe his car hydroplane on the water but he had ample time to adjust his speed and correct his course which he failed and thus drove his vehicle in an unsafe manner.

I still don't get what he was trying to confess. If he were really sorry he would have gone to the police station and turned himself in after all it was an accident. Running away from scene I could give him benefit of doubt that in India you can get beaten up by mob rage but after that he just moved on so to me it seems like he was entrapping them and went with a game plan to make them feel sorry for him and win over their trust.

Originally posted by: Nikhil718

I wouldn't call him a bad driver. The main problem was the fire pipe falling over as there was to much water. This is the reason why he couldn't see properly while driving. Him running over that guy was an accident because like I said, there was to much water.

He felt bad running over that guy but I wouldn't put all the blame on him because it was an accident.

I don't think he deliberately attempted to make a move on his fiancee. I mean he liked her, but he was still gulity about what happened. His main purpose was to confess and ask for the family forgivness. Plus, to make sure their business stays on track as it was going downhill.

She liked him more than he liked her. The thing was that he scared to tell her what happened. It was the victims father who told her everything. Yes, another guy a propose to her but she liked Priyanshu.

The ending was logical. He finally admited to her what happened but the suicide attempt shows how bad he felt. Police made it clear that the family need him more than the law, so there was no need to arrest him. It was an accident.

Originally posted by: glace-bleue

A man lost his life because of someone's reckless driving ...the police has no authority to decide if it was an accident or not...it should have gone to court and clearly HIT and RUN is a crime...when u kill someone ...no amount of apologies or feeling remorse make up for it...that is setting a wrong example...u do the crime u do the time...aise toh all the rich people will be reckless, kill and then compensate with money...what is a poor person supposed to do if he kills someone and has no money to compensate the victim?

Originally posted by: glace-bleue

A man lost his life because of someone's reckless driving ...the police has no authority to decide if it was an accident or not...it should have gone to court and clearly HIT and RUN is a crime...when u kill someone ...no amount of apologies or feeling remorse make up for it...that is setting a wrong example...u do the crime u do the time...aise toh all the rich people will be reckless, kill and then compensate with money...what is a poor person supposed to do if he kills someone and has no money to compensate the victim?