Sorry,but ur viewpoint doesn,t impress me at all.Well if u say,it was a popularity contest,then ronit shud have won as he is more popular than pd,but did that happen?nah!!!Coming to judges decision,well it were they themselve who said that prachi indeed hud make iot to finals.Didn't u see how judges reacted when prachi was eliminated,they cudn't beleive it a bit as they thought prachi wud make to finals as she has really matured as a dancer.
Moving on to the most debatable topic popularity vs talent.Well my dear,if ur not talented,how can u impress the audience.Prachi has won the hearts of millions with her acting histronics and her improvement as a dancer was really commendable and u shud remember that prachi was lagging just one point behind sandhya,thats it!!!!!
Let me tell u unlike singing,dancing is about aura,personality,expresions.Even though srk and govinda may not be the best dancers,but still even they take the centre stage,people get mesmerized,due to the way they conduct themselves.Prachi and sandhya more or less equalized each other on every platform.Yeah,but prachi's popularity did give her an edge,but that doesn't mean she was a bad dancer,she was terrific.
Lastly on the issue,ekta favouring prachi,i have my own opinion.Aren't ronit and sudha ekta's favourite?if ekta has wished she wud have made sure that sandhya didn't reach the finals.And more importantly,symergy went ahead with wild round,only after obltaining bbc's permission.Let me tell u that if bbc had been against it,sony wud not have been able to do wild card round,even if they wre told to do so by some of the most powerful indian media personalities like yash chopra,ekat kapoor,karan johar or any one.It seems as if sandhya cudn't win,her fans have got an excuse to eclipse her defeat,blame it on ekta!!! I am not saying sandy was not talented,but prachi was equally taleted too.Regarding urmila,we all know her status in the industry,no films in hand and her behaviour yesterday really was absolutely disusting!!!!1 🤢 🤢 🤢
Cricket
