Karan Johar, 'Naseerudin Shah not fraternity member.'

"not becoming of a fraternity member" does not mean not a fraternity member. but anyways karan is an idiot. who are these two queens (tina and karan) to tell someone that they cannot state their opinion. so because someone is dead we cant even criticize their work? these two were probably sitting on a sofa drinking wine and tee heeing while tweeting

She should focus on the free the nipple moment and not bother defending pedophiles. That runs contrary to her misandry values.

What is wrong in Tina defending her father or KJo ? IDK the history of BW but I have heard say Rajesh Khanna was the first Superstar. I have repeated this like a broken record. Acting is not always award winning portraying asli zindagi in mostly rona dhona roles. There is a place for that and I respect the effort people like Nasserudin Shah do. But it is really hubris on the part of Nasserudin Shah to summarily dismiss Rajesh Khanna as a "bad actor". I have heard people used to go crazy after him. If it is anything like the craze for Rajnikanth I get it.

Originally posted by: Justmoi

What is wrong in Tina defending her father or KJo ? IDK the history of BW but I have heard say Rajesh Khanna was the first Superstar. I have repeated this like a broken record. Acting is not always award winning portraying asli zindagi in mostly rona dhona roles. There is a place for that and I respect the effort people like Nasserudin Shah do. But it is really hubris on the part of Nasserudin Shah to summarily dismiss Rajesh Khanna as a "bad actor". I have heard people used to go crazy after him. If it is anything like the craze for Rajnikanth I get it.

For years I sat on a high horse saying he is not an actor. But I am and was so wrong and so is Nasserudin Shah. I will never say Rajni is a great actor. but the connection he has with vast amounts of people, of all ages, different nationalities is amazing. If Rajesh Khanna had that with his audience how dare we say otherwise. That is also acting. In fact acting at its very core is a connection between the actor and his audience and to summarily dismiss that is not just arrogance but hubris, I don't care who says it, a respected actor like Nasserudin Shah or a nobody movie lover like me. It's wrong.

The issue is that they - Tina & Kjo think they have a right to their opinion and NS doesn't. WHY?

Why does someone not have a right to state an opinion that an actor who may have had mass appeal as an artiste doesn't meet a particular persons criterion of being a good actor.Why can he ,in fact , not go ahead and say - to contrary belief I think he outright sucked.

Why do these two feel so entitled? Tomorrow if someone says AB is a shitty actor or Salman/SRK suck as actors - how and why is that unbecoming of a fraternity member. Who are they to decide?

Kudos to Naseer for saying what he wanted to and he has been a "becoming" member of the fraternity long before and in a more befitting way than these two could ever hope to accomplish.

I strongly detest this sense of entitlement these ''fraternity'' kids have.

Originally posted by: ranikaadi

Karan Johar @karanjohar

I agree with you @mrsfunnybones...due respect to seniority but this was in exceptionally bad taste and not becoming of a fraternity member..

This guy is literally as sad as anyone can get...

More the opposite. KJo directly called him a fraternity member but states that Naseerudin Shah's statement does not match that of a fraternity member.

NS is entitled to his opinion and Twinkle and KJo can disagree, but it doesn't prevent NS from having one in the first place

KJo disses the industry every week in his blog and accuses others of not being 'fraternity members.'

I didn't like what nasser said but I m not liking whatever kjo is writing these days.. He is just in different state of mind or perhaps his psychologist/adviser is making him more confused... his writings don't make sense to me anymore..

Originally posted by: Inquisitivesoul

The issue is that they - Tina & Kjo think they have a right to their opinion and NS doesn't. WHY?

Why does someone not have a right to state an opinion that an actor who may have had mass appeal as an artiste doesn't meet a particular persons criterion of being a good actor.Why can he ,in fact , not go ahead and say - to contrary belief I think he outright sucked.

Why do these two feel so entitled? Tomorrow if someone says AB is a shitty actor or Salman/SRK suck as actors - how and why is that unbecoming of a fraternity member. Who are they to decide?

Kudos to Naseer for saying what he wanted to and he has been a "becoming" member of the fraternity long before and in a more befitting way than these two could ever hope to accomplish.

I strongly detest this sense of entitlement these ''fraternity'' kids have.