Why do these directors cast such talentless girls.

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

cougarTown

@cougarTown

Sparkler

+ 6

Posted: 9 years ago

#11

jacki was pretty good

she has presence..she stood out..

but nargis and lisa were awful. Nargis could still manage to move 1,2 facial muscles..lisa couldn't even manage that. ZERO screen presence.ZERO charm as well

Quote

Pappu.Pager

@Pappu.Pager

Dazzler

Posted: 9 years ago

#12

because someone has to do them?!

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

hotchic.

@hotchic

Sparkler

+ 5

Posted: 9 years ago

#13

The movie itself was awful so little addition is harmless.

For a movie like HS3, the three were actually gems.

Quote

RamSiyaRam

@RamSiyaRam

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

#14

The harsh truth is there is the deal that the girls would sleep with them and in return they would cast them. So the girls fulfilled their part and next the producer/director does. Also the girl gets paid for it too. She gets a movie release.

Quote

Rekha_ji

@Rekha_ji

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 9 years ago

#15

Maybe Kareena, Sonakshi + Asin were busy

Quote

Daayan Bai

@KunwaariDaayan

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 9 years ago

#16

It's not about being talented these days..it's all about give and take..NEPOTISM...You scratch my back I'll scratch yours.It's all about looking sexy,hot and shedding inhibitions.As long as these actresses are pleasing to the visuals...stand there and can look pretty... what more do audiences want...A shame really but that's the way like it or or not it is...They rake in the moolahs...job well done...period.