Posted:
This isn't about logic its about common sense and as the audience we can expect it from the cvs. Ok lets just stick to the point where Shivanya has no reason to suspect Yamini and similarly no reason to believe SS. If Yamini is like her brother the king of panchner and protector of the naagmani had killed the icchadhari snakes thereby misusing his gift but at the end he got backstabbedby Anky and his gang who plundered his wealth and got him bankrupt. The main question that should hit Shiv is why have they still kept him alive?? And why would SS who is supposedly greedy choose to live under inhumane conditions just to keep the naagmani for himself when he can just split the money collected from its sale with the rest of the murderers and continue to live an already prosperous life?
he didnt chose to live in inhumane conditions remember he was capture by anky... before he could sale it ...n they kept him alive to get to madi..as he is the only one to pic it... if nt ritik.. .. and SS played ..if i cant get madi u will nt to...
none story are perfect or 100%logical evry charcter is meant to have sum loopholes... if ur asking shiv tht she is stupid i thnk all characters are stupid thn... cause everone has missed major thngs
if every1 start to put two n two together shows will end as 2 hrs episodic rather thn soaps or finite
Anupamaa
Naagin 7
Health and Fitness
