Karna in my Eyes. - Page 4

Originally posted by: amankoushal

the biggest sin of karna was the insult of draupadi
whatever other things karna did are nothing compared to it

Originally posted by: Samsangeetha

I HAD NEVER FELT ITS A GOOD ANALYSIS...WHY ARE U JUSTIFYING DRUAPDI SO MUCH I had never felt she is so innocent...why everyone hide her rude behaviour... she had insulted karna only in the name of lower caste...if she was good human being she will consider evry caste as equal...she want to marry her love arjuna...for that she humilated him publicly...did he have no feelings...and she called duryodhana as blind man's son also blind...that was clearly said in vyas mahabharat and mrityunjaya book... so she insulted a man in position of father in law and duryodhan...and laughed at him lot...did they have no feelings...according to some folks...she had said to vrushali that her husband has magnifying beauty and strength...and she wish sometimes...if he also was her husband..i dont is it right...but still she was not dharma patni...she really loved arjuna only...there are so many situations in mahabharat were bheem dissapointed with her over glorifying nature of arjun..and she always want to be queen...so she said against bheem when yudhishtir asked him to rule...becoz if bheem become king according to his marriage hidumbi will be the queen...and kunti also cant be justifyed..she is failure as a mother...she only knows to give birth...THE ACTUAL LADY CHARACTER IN MAHABHARAT IS GANDHAARI...everyone is busy in talking about druapdi's apaman...for me druapdi is lady with huge pride...really gandhaari was the sacrifacing woman...what druapdi had did as sacriface...and its not only karna...but also 5 pandavas especially yudhishtir ,bheeshma,drona...everyone is responsible for her vastraharan...why always blaming kauravas...??? DID PANDAVAS DID THE RIGHT THING...they have male domination and ego..they consider their wife as their own property...hate those guys...i disagree with most of the views...ITS A PERSONAL OPINION BUT THINK AM I RIGHT?

Originally posted by: sitharak

I HAD NEVER FELT ITS A GOOD ANALYSIS...WHY ARE U JUSTIFYING DRUAPDI SO MUCH I had never felt she is so innocent...why everyone hide her rude behaviour... she had insulted karna only in the name of lower caste...if she was good human being she will consider evry caste as equal...she want to marry her love arjuna...for that she humilated him publicly...did he have no feelings...and she called duryodhana as blind man's son also blind...that was clearly said in vyas mahabharat and mrityunjaya book... so she insulted a man in position of father in law and duryodhan...and laughed at him lot...did they have no feelings...according to some folks...she had said to vrushali that her husband has magnifying beauty and strength...and she wish sometimes...if he also was her husband..i dont is it right...but still she was not dharma patni...she really loved arjuna only...there are so many situations in mahabharat were bheem dissapointed with her over glorifying nature of arjun..and she always want to be queen...so she said against bheem when yudhishtir asked him to rule...becoz if bheem become king according to his marriage hidumbi will be the queen...and kunti also cant be justifyed..she is failure as a mother...she only knows to give birth...THE ACTUAL LADY CHARACTER IN MAHABHARAT IS GANDHAARI...everyone is busy in talking about druapdi's apaman...for me druapdi is lady with huge pride...really gandhaari was the sacrifacing woman...what druapdi had did as sacriface...and its not only karna...but also 5 pandavas especially yudhishtir ,bheeshma,drona...everyone is responsible for her vastraharan...why always blaming kauravas...??? DID PANDAVAS DID THE RIGHT THING...they have male domination and ego..they consider their wife as their own property...hate those guys...i disagree with most of the views...ITS A PERSONAL OPINION BUT THINK AM I RIGHT?