robbie should decide

hi,
i was wondering that durshant aint the one who has the right to divide the house in two parts.not even purshottam but it should be robbie.because he is the one who saved the house from being sold n also from their families to be on the road.n durshant doesnt even do anything robbie does his concerts from where they get money for the company.so how can durshant divide the house.wat do u all say?
-ayesha-

Ayesha don't try 2 find logic in shows u will bang ur head but won't get d ans. Dushant/Purshotam def don't have rite 2 decide d division of d house like u said d house was going 2 be gone 4m their hands & Robbie saved it so he has rite 2 decide. When Dushant said abt partition i was surprised i think he needs 2 get reminded tht their house which was in Robbie name & who transfered it 2 Raunak was girvi & they were going 2 be on roads & Robbie paid d entire amt so shdn't he take permission 2 stay in house. also, when he divided d house it looked as if he is ordering Purshotam tht this part is mine & this urs. I wud say 'Ek toh chori upar se seena zori'

Shruti

OMG!!!...ok so now the parents are going to ask the kids whether they can stay in their house or no???....i dunno but i think thts stupid...yeah ok...so the house technically belongs to Robbie...but before the house was robbies it was his parents n before it was his parents' it was their parents...its been passed down for generations..and if not anything atleast being parents gives them the right to do wht they want to in what was 'their' house...besides as long as parents are alive i don't think kids have the right to make such decisions like batwara n all...thts jus my opinion!

@mtbenjamin:I agree parents don't need 2 ask d kids 2 stay in their home but what Dushant did i don't agree 2 it. As a parents i can understand Dushant's state he lost his son, his son's bets frd proposes his daughter in law on his son's chautha which gave a chance 2 ppl 2 raise fingers on his family. Dushant-Purshotam have been best of frds & frds do have fights but Dushant always use 2 say Purshotam he wud leave his house while Purshotam stopped him whenever Dushant thought of leaving home.

Purshotam always supported Raunak & Singhania family going against Robbie/Devika but 2day when he supported his son's act does it means Purshotam is being selfish & thinking only of his son. When Purshotam went against Robbie that time Dushant never put any allegations on him but 2day when he thought what Robbie did was rite means he is being selfish. Is it fair 2 Purshotam.

Shruti

@Shruti I never said Purshotam is being selfish...i wasn't even considering that side of the story...i was jus disagreeing w/ the topic starter..cuz she said tht robbie should be the one tht decides on whether there should be a batwara or not..all i said was tht since both the parents are still alive they should be the ones deciding on the batwara issue...and as far as being selfish ...well i don't think anyone is really being selfish here...cuz considering the circumstances i think they all have valid reasons as to why they are behaving the way they are(as crazy as they are behaving)...cuz whtever happened over the past few days is not easy to deal with.. n i agree tht if either of the families were to leave it would have to be dushyant n fly....cuz as i mentioned before Robbie is the owner of the house...n Dushyant did say tht they would be there only til he found a place of his own....so yeah i don't think purshotam is being selfish...i was actually glad that he actually stood up for his son for once 😊