Mandy befriended with Gizel verses Mandy fought with Gizel - Page 3

Originally posted by: MadOwhat

LMAO...Dont think you understood even wee bit of my post ...you assumed a lot of thing and gave a long reply😆...Mandy style😉

The first line & the bold above was explicit enough...let me make a second attempt to see if it goes through

My response was to your Assumption, Assumption, Assumption comment for DewDrops not the thread subject per se(which i thought was senseless ) ...and FYI...Mandy was incidental since she is frame of reference.

The point is most people base their choices on assumptions(Like or Dislike) ...and ignore hard facts...hence i find the ASSUMPTION comment absolutely baseless

For eg...You are supporting someone who is unsocial, Selfish, Fake, Stupid, has double standards, plays in isolation(a perennial victim)...all proved factually (unless denial is opted by default) ...I wonder what are the positives that make you support (entirely your prerogative)...since I dont see any positives in Mandy lately...I am inclined to believe you are assuming many thing to convince yourself on Mandy's positive attribute.

Kindly enlighten me on the positives ...would love to be proved wrong ...and I will happily revive my support to Mandy (Underlined - TBH can testify on my Behalf ) ...but all your point for support should be assumption free😆...matbal pure facts that can be proved.

On the thread subject comment

You said it right...I am sensible...rest i guess you couldn't comprehend ...COULD BE means its a possibility...not a certainty...I always TRY not to assume

The thread subject has two isolated issues listed ...if your implied inference is that the second statement proves the first wrong...then it is totally based on assumptions

You assumed that :-

• Mandy cant have momentary lapse of reason...and lose her temper ...The past pattern goes against her ...she has always been impulsive...and has suffered as a consequence
• Gizelle will immediately spill the beans on Mandy as a response to her temper...Gizelle thus far is seen as cool customer...she may do it later or may decide not to spill at all ...totally her prerogative😛

...if the 2 statement are not related the thread subject doesn't make any sense...which was my first reaction till i read replies to the post

Disclaimer - I have no issues with assumptions or choices based on assumption ...just reacting to your reservation on ...ASSUMPTION ASSUMPTION ASSUMPTION comment.😛

Mandana is here to play to win and whatever tactics she uses for it , be it being alone, playing victim is fine as long as she doesnt hurt others and doesnt bully others which she hasnt so far

That is beauty of Mandy, or in other term it is beauty of reality(non-fakeness) that people will keep speculating or assuming, because they are confused.. In the end their boycotting mission failed miserably. All came in Jhund to attack her and get footage.. Mandy is smart, she just move out from the scene and desperate people left with no footage.. Then Rochelle tried to get some left over footage by coming between Rishabh and Priya, Rishabh pushed her little bit because her butt was about to touch him at wrong place., that was epic. Rishabh is sanskaari banda.. In whole show, I like Mandy and Rishabh, they are playing game individually.

Originally posted by: Ctrl-Alt-Del

[

Dew's Post was totally based on Assumptions so I gave the comment Assumption Assumptions Assumption and that too Contradictory Assumptions.

Your First Post had some Partial Facts so I cared to reply to tell you where and why I agree or disagree.

Your Second Post is nothing but a Verbose Nonsense, so I'd choose not to reply.

p.s. I have zero interest in making someone like the person I like. I like Mandy and that's enough for me. Even if the entire world is against her, I give a damn.

Originally posted by: MadOwhat

Bold blue - not surprised ...was expecting it wont reach the place it was intended to...😆 ...but i had to try

Moral of the story - some have free passage to comment without logic ( read assumption)...rest dont...Jahanpanah Tusi great ho 🤪

I was right in the first instance...the thread subject has no cerebral content ...thanks for confirming👍🏼

Bold Red - In short you dont have a convincing reason to support your argument...or to prove that your basis of choice is not assumption ...btw you can like anyone, said very explicitly in my disclaimer...but others have a point of view too...so next time I see assumption assumption assumption ...I guess it means...i cant put an logical argument...gotcha.