Salman Khans reaction to Madhuri Dixit getting paid more in HAHK - Page 11

Created

Last reply

Replies

108

Views

12.3k

Users

49

Likes

558

Frequent Posters

263437 thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: Joker19


so One ALL TIME BLOCKBUSTER MPK one blockbuster 2 hits and two successes is starting career ..hahahaha

Madhuri's entire hits at that time was not even close to MPK STATUS and you call her big..she was like Deepika today but still she wasn't getting paid more than Govinda or Aamir or Salman or even SRK back then due to their status as male leads...come up with new stuff.


Yes, he was getting started as he had been around for only a few years.

Salman gave one blockbuster and multiple flops at the beginning of his career. Madhuri also struggled when she started, but then she became a superstar over time in the the late 80s and 90s. She started her career before Salman and was a bigger name when HAHK was made. Nobody is suggesting that she was getting paid more than the male superstars of that time (like Anil, Govinda, etc). Salman was on his way to becoming a megastar, but at that time he was not that established.
Edited by CarrotCake - 10 years ago
moniluvskinshuk thumbnail
Visit Streak 750 Thumbnail 15th Anniversary Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: adventurousman



hahaha, oh sallu's delusional fans 😆

btw, u do know that every top actor now charges percentage? U think he didn't charge for PRDP? U know he gets 50% profits even though he hasn't invested a single rupee in it?

and it might be even more than 50%

haan haan, sallu toh devta hain, charge nahin karta film ke liye, aap ke charan kaha hain mujhe milnahin rahein 😉



So if he hadn't charged anything for PRDP coz of his loyalty for SB , toh isme Mahaan devta hone ki baat kahan se aa gayi ? . And read it CAREFULLY I just talked about him not charging anything for PRDP .., Not Charging anything for any Film ki baat kahan se aa gayi ? Difference Samajh mein aata hai ki nahi dono ke beech ? 🥱

Zaroorat nahi hai Charan chune ki . Bas Faltoo ka Quote aur Reply naa karke hi Ehsaan kar dena . Bahut hoga ..
moniluvskinshuk thumbnail
Visit Streak 750 Thumbnail 15th Anniversary Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: Joker19


I think not .. Salman does no favors anymore plus he's huge now and the movie took almost a year to shoot ..Salman could've s to shot 2 movies instead of PRDP.



U are sidelining one fact that Salman-Sooraj Shares a very Strong Bonding . They are much more then Actor-Director as they both together started their Career from MPK . They both share a very String Emotional bonding with each other .Thatz why SK was / is alwaysloyal to Rajshri & Sooraj . It doesn't matter for him that Shooting schedule is going long . He shot Bajrangi Bhaijaan in between that . Plus Some things are much more then money thing . And SB himself said it that SK didn't charge anything for PRDP .
Edited by moniluvskinshuk - 10 years ago
adventurousman thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: moniluvskinshuk



So if he hadn't charged anything for PRDP coz of his loyalty for SB , toh isme Mahaan devta hone ki baat kahan se aa gayi ? . And read it CAREFULLY I just talked about him not charging anything for PRDP .., Not Charging anything for any Film ki baat kahan se aa gayi ? Difference Samajh mein aata hai ki nahi dono ke beech ? 🥱

Zaroorat nahi hai Charan chune ki . Bas Faltoo ka Quote aur Reply naa karke hi Ehsaan kar dena . Bahut hoga ..



No, u r saying that sallu is a loyal friend of suraj and that's why he was paid less and even now when sallu is a big superstar, he hasn't charged anything for PRDP, so you're misrepresenting him like 'look at our great sallu, he is such a good guy, he is such a good friend, he was a bigger star than madhuri at that time and the reason he wasn't paid as much as her is because of his loyalty'

do u see? No, my dear, u need to read carefully. I also was talking about PRDP. U saying he didn't charge anything isn't true, as I pointed out every superstar charges in % now otherwise the budget would be too high to even get a hit tag even if it makes 200crs.

The budget of kick was like 100cr, with sallu's fees it would have been 200cr, now it makes 214cr, it won't even be a hit.

but now he has profit sharing deal of so and so %, so now it makes 214cr, he gets 100cr or maybe 80cr, only they know.

if u think, he is slacking his fee for rajshree because of his friendship than u r deluding yourself, and if u post it here then I'll point that out, don't misrepresent him, as simple as that.

don't tell half baked truths. He didn't charge for PRDP (true) but also point, he is getting x amount of % from producers just like every big superstar these days, so doesn't make him any different nor does this fact add anything to the topic at hand.

fact is, madhuri was paid more for HAHK, u saying he has his loyalty towards rajshree and that's why he was paid less or look, he is such a big superstar now and still he is paid nothing for PRDP, are false.

Got it?

faltoo ka ehsaan nahin karta mein kisi pe 😉
Mrignaini thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 10 years ago
What the hell is so commend worthy in what he's said to demand respect.. reporters bhi.. Sallu stans everywhere..
moniluvskinshuk thumbnail
Visit Streak 750 Thumbnail 15th Anniversary Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 10 years ago
@adventureousman

U STILL didn't get the point . Did u ? There is BIG DIFFERENCE between Getting Paid Less and Charging less . I didn't say SB paid him less . I said Salman always Charged Less from Rajshree coz of his reasons . So If someone is charging anything less from his Friend ..Toh where the hell it is BEING MAHAAN ? Don't u know the difference between Being Loyal , respectful & Being Mahaan ? And YES he didn't charge anything for PRDP . It's not a big deal for him to skip one Film's fees . And The profit sharing which u are talking about is completely different thing . Don't mix up with this point & give faltu ka lecture here to me .

Ghuma phira ke baat nahi karte toh Don't misinterpret my reply and comment too . And Now Don't Quote me saying anything Coz i am not interested in arguing with u . Got it ?
adventurousman thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: moniluvskinshuk

@adventureousman

U STILL didn't get the point . Did u ? There is BIG DIFFERENCE between Getting Paid Less and Charging less . I didn't say SB paid him less . I said Salman always Charged Less from Rajshree coz of his reasons . So If someone is charging anything less from his Friend ..Toh where the hell it is BEING MAHAAN ? Don't u know the difference between Being Loyal , respectful & Being Mahaan ? And YES he didn't charge anything for PRDP . It's not a big deal for him to skip one Film's fees . And The profit sharing which u are talking about is completely different thing . Don't mix up with this point & give faltu ka lecture here to me .

Ghuma phira ke baat nahi karte toh Don't misinterpret my reply and comment too . And Now Don't Quote me saying anything Coz i am not interested in arguing with u . Got it ?



haha, if u r not interested in arguing then why do u keep replying? No, my dear, u didn't get the point because u r wearing bhai's bhakt glasses, take them off and u might see 😊

yea, salman charged less for HAHK is false. He was paid less than madhuri, simple as that. U r saying, he was paid less because he charged less and that's because bhai is such a good friend, so if madhuri was paid more than him, then no credit is given to her because its not because she was a bigger star at that time, its because, bhai was too loyal to rajshree that he charged less, don't u see his mahanta in that 😆

Simple fact is, that madhuri was a bigger star and got paid more and sallu couldn't even accept that as he has a gigantic universe size ego and then bhai bhakts like u come in and justify that with false reasoning, so I'll keep quoting u and replying 😉

u r still not getting it, please take off those glasses immediately 😆 u see, no big star charges any fees, so he is not skipping his fee like u r saying he is. They all have profit sharing deals, that's the truth, no superstar signs a movie and takes 50cr, be it aamir, sallu or srk. So yea then its not a big deal for any one of them.

U saying he didn't charge because of his loyalty is bullshit and I'm calling u out on that. U r making him this loyal friend who is indebted to rajshree and that's why he didn't charge much and because of that, madhuri was paid more not because she was a bigger star and even today he is such a good friend and remembers his friends that he didn't charge a penny for PRDP 👏

We see through him even if u don't, so if u put him like that then I'll expose him and your false claims.

Simple as that, got it my dear? Now, if u want to end the argument then don't reply because I won't stop 😆
Edited by adventurousman - 10 years ago
965891 thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: Joker19


so One ALL TIME BLOCKBUSTER MPK one blockbuster 2 hits and two successes is starting career ..hahahaha

Madhuri's entire hits at that time was not even close to MPK STATUS and you call her big..she was like Deepika today but still she wasn't getting paid more than Govinda or Aamir or Salman or even SRK back then due to their status as male leads...come up with new stuff.

How many blockbusters did Salman deliver after MPK and before HAHK?Salman had 6 back to back flops before HAHK.How many Salman films were highest grosser of the year.Madhuri's films were highest grossers of the year.
1988-Tezaab
1990-Dil
1991-Saajan
1992-Beta
1993-Khalnayak- second highest grosser




Edited by RogerFedrer - 10 years ago
807116 thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
Actor Pran was paid more than Amitabh in Amitabh's initial years, which included the movie Zanjeer and Don. Nobody (including Amitabh) have denied it. This does negate the fact that, Amitabh was a superstar for a decade later.
Probably if Nana Patekar or Anil Kapoor had acted along with Salman in that movie and were paid more than him, it would not have hurt Salman. It is also possible, Sanjay Dutt would have been paid more than Salman in "Sajan". Salman can digest that too. Problem here (HAHK) was, Madhuri was a woman 😕.

Today, if Deepika acts with Varun or Sid, she might charge more. The scenario may be different, if these boys are able to sustain in Bollywood for a decade.

For those who comment on Madhri's current position with respect to Salman; everyone knows female leads in Bollywood have a short span. But at the end of the day, both (male and female) are judged on their achievements, not on the span. Nargis holds the same place as RajKapoor, though her span was short and Raj Kapoor delivered hits with other heroines for many more years. In future, Kajol will have the same place in viewer's heart as Sharukh, though number of her movies are less compared Sharukh.


Related Topics

Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: MiVida_Messi · 4 months ago

I don't know what is happening https://x.com/krrishukt/status/1925532997983306029?s=46 t=74Fftld4jR1M5tPxEU7sHA

https://x.com/krrishukt/status/1925532997983306029?s=46
Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: priya185 · 6 months ago

Celebrities for Salman Khan Eid party https://www.instagram.com/reel/DH4LzoStDJm/?igsh=MWZ2a29jd2k5OXRpeQ==

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: rckRadhe · 3 months ago

https://www.bollywoodshaadis.com/articles/sonam-kapoor-likes-a-post-hinting-at-deepika-padukone-paid-for-walk-of-fame-fans-react-65462...

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: Rosyme · 5 months ago

...

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood · 1 months ago

https://x.com/Rahulrautwrites/status/1963867078483488860

https://x.com/Rahulrautwrites/status/1963867078483488860
Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".