libraetc's posts and hatemongering - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

11

Views

1.1k

Users

9

Likes

20

Frequent Posters

kavitha_r thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 10 years ago
#11

Originally posted by: sandiab

i agree about u Sharoon. She doesn't feel raj is good looking on or off screen and that is ok. We got enough love for Raj that she wnt be affected by such comments. And if any1 has seen libs previous posts were not 1 word made sense bt in her senseless posts she made valid points but her racist comments took away from her posts. At least now she writes in better english and regarding the show she is absolutely correct. Her views on Raj thats her views. Bt most likely she probably made up that story ab her dad whilst commenting coz she was having so much fun dissing lol. Bt really Libs takes abit of time but she eventually understands and considering the 1st page of her post she controlled herself and replied sensibly she will eventually not be so retarded. Love u Libs.



Libs is not bad at heart. She will post whatever comes to her heart & mind. Her points may be valid or invalid but the best way of getting close to her is to agree with her at least in some points.

For eg. she said that YuvAni should divorce as there is no love between them. There is a point in what she says.

No offenses Libs. We are good friends.
JelenaH thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#12

Originally posted by: anita_m

The best way to deal with people who are deliberately offensive is to ignore them, and I'm going to follow that policy with Libs from now on. If she says something I agree with without dissing someone in a way I disagree with, fine, otherwise I'm not feeding that post. Answering and defending or arguing is pointless.
Sandi, yeah, you diss too, but you don't seem vicious, like all the hate in the world is pouring out of you.
I was thinking also, that we shouldn't get so defensive either--just report if someone is needlessly derogatory. I don't care if libs calls Rajshri dark and doesn't like her features or her voice. I object to her calling her 'woh kaali' or 'pandeeya' or using terms that are meant to be demeaning. BUT would I feel the same if demeaning terms were used for, say, dadi? Don't I call her 'old hag', 'old witch', 'BQ', accuse her of pimping, etc? (I also called Lata a cow, but that's really a kind term compared to what I'd like to say.) So isn't it that we think it's okay for a villianous character but not for a character who's popular? Double standards?
And isn't it a kind of reverse derogation to act like Rajshri needs defending? Would you defend, say Sonu Chandrapal if someone called her ugly? She's answer enough. So is Rajshri. My God, see her pics on Jelena's page. She looks freaking beautiful.
Finally, each to her own. Libs gets her kicks by being nasty and riling people. Each time we reply, it encourages her.



Couldn't agree more with your reply Anita and such abhorrent filth that that post was spreading should not even justify a response!! On a side note we're ecstatic that you are visiting Rajshri's Fanpage and cannot thank each and everyone of you enough in showing your support!'

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".