Why is foolishness glorified in Indian soaps? - Page 4

Originally posted by: naq5

raginis dadi was responsible for her original mother's death? how . ? can please sum1 tell me

Originally posted by: tejaswiniwenham

I think dida was joking about that. I'm sorry chavi but i just don't understand why lucky needs to change at all?!? does he have any bad habits? is he a relentless womanizer or an alcoholic or battameez or unkind? no na, he is a stand up guy and a good human being who has the guts to take a stance against his own family for the sake of whats right. then what about him needs correcting? any small mistakes he's made, ragini only put parda on it, it was swara who literally made him hold his ears and encouraged him to correct his mistakes. as far as his broad minded care free attitude goes, which by the gadodia family including ragini's definition is awaragardi, thats what makes him a good person. if he loses that then theres nothing left in him. the only thing of lucky's that i could see changing is his immaturity and financial dependency on parents. i really doubt, ragini, who can barely think for herself and needs taking care of both materially and emotionally and is clearly not very socially adept, let alone street smart, will prove to be a good partner for laksh to make him more mature and independent. ragini herself is very immature and clueless about how the world works. how can she correct anyone kaan pakadke?!?

Originally posted by: lovely_lady

Wow, extremely well argued Tejaswini (hope that's you name/ can call you that LOL)!

I agree with each and every point of yours. Swara is basically the life partner Laksh wants -- someone who is his best friend but also isn't afraid to call him out on his shit. Although I do think Swara is a bit too strict/ rude with him sometimes.

The thing with Ragini is that she's in love with an image of Laksh. She doesn't really know the real Laksh as he's always, or at least tries to be, on good behaviour with her. With Swara on the other hand, Laksh has no pretences and acts the way he is.

Originally posted by: lovely_lady

Wow, extremely well argued Tejaswini (hope that's you name/ can call you that LOL)!

yes my name is tejaswini 😆. you can call me either that or teju. whats you name my dear lady?

I agree with each and every point of yours. Swara is basically the life partner Laksh wants -- someone who is his best friend but also isn't afraid to call him out on his shit. Although I do think Swara is a bit too strict/ rude with him sometimes.

i agree that she's a bit too rude with him sometimes. but i guess he enjoys that. 😉 laksh isn't some macho, I'm MAN type of a guy. he wants to be able to tease his partner and do all this nokjhok. i think sometimes he'll do things just to get a rise out of her. 😆

The thing with Ragini is that she's in love with an image of Laksh. She doesn't really know the real Laksh as he's always, or at least tries to be, on good behaviour with her. With Swara on the other hand, Laksh has no pretences and acts the way he is.

i have said it time and time again that ragini doesn't love laksh at all cos she doesn't know laksh at all but theres little you can say that'll make sense to fandoms. i understand a fan sentiment i guess. its often above rationality. they want to see ragya happen even if ragini and laksh don't love each other but laksh does love swara and swara maybe reciprocates. i blame the media that often portray these stereotypical opposites attract and forced marriages as a romantic situation to be in. i can take personal guarantee that the reality of those marriages are very different than shown. its not just accidental romance and silent sacrificing. its shouting matches, unhappiness and a solid fortune worth of therapy. some lucky people find happiness eventually and some break. a forced marriage is never romantic. so they need to stop glorifying silliness and all these majboori ki shaadi crap. i hope i don't offend anyone, i do understand the train of thoughts of a fan and respect it.