larki_punjaban thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
#1
wasnt salman being in that show before?
😕 i think it was the first season with rohit or something...

somebody guide me plzz!

Created

Last reply

Replies

8

Views

1.6k

Users

6

Likes

5

Frequent Posters

Sweet_Ashum thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 10 years ago
#2
Yes he was in the previous season
He has been brought back as a challenger
Sweet_Ashum thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 10 years ago
#3
Only for a few episodes
not.here thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#4
i wanted the challenger to be a real stuntman/woman. like really give a challenge.
Shehreen_27 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
#5
He was one of the best contestants in KKK last year but didn't win the show because he screwed up in some of the last stunts. I think bringing him as a challenger is a lot better than bringing someone actually professional! because a professional stunt man/woman can easily beat all the contestants and that would seriously be too unfair! it would be like comparing a professional dancer with someone who's just taking baby steps into dancing. Salman, according to me, is the perfect choice. He has been in the show earlier, he has experienced a lot of things and is capable of being a challenger.
chahat4u thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 10 years ago
#6
Rohit Sir started hosting KKK since last year's season. Salman was very much a contestant then in the last season and he had been in third position I think after Rajneesh and Gurmeet. He was a good contestant yes.
Though I never like this challenger concept in any show, especially when contestants who already had their fair chance get another chance.But, if anyone at all had to be brought in for adding spice, then he is a good choice.
Edited by chahat4u - 10 years ago
not.here thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#7
I understand the points but if the challenger was made to just challenge and not win then it could work, for example the challenger would set a time, and the contestant closest to it or beating it would win. Or another way would be that if the challenge was not met then the contestants would have time deducted. The show makers could judge what type of stuntman or woman to get. For me it would take kkk to a higher level. It's an idea, that's all.
chahat4u thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 10 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: AryaDrayCoByrne

I understand the points but if the challenger was made to just challenge and not win then it could work, for example the challenger would set a time, and the contestant closest to it or beating it would win. Or another way would be that if the challenge was not met then the contestants would have time deducted. The show makers could judge what type of stuntman or woman to get. For me it would take kkk to a higher level. It's an idea, that's all.


yes I agree to this. That way is much better and more enjoyable truly. If he doesn't play to win but just to increase challenges then it gets better.
978187 thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#9
he was there only for 2 episodes as a threat to the contestants , to scare them and us 😆

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".