Why blame Subbu when Ishita has the same thought!!

Just a few weeks ago, Ishita said to Raman "agar Ruhi hai toh hum hai"..."there is no 'us' if Ruhi is not there". She again proved that she will shower her love or get close to Raman if it's somewhere related to Ruhi. DT said in the latest IV that "Ishita's love is always through Ruhi"...if after one year of their marriage, Ishita still needs Ruhi to continue her love that again justifies Subbu's point. Subbu said "pyar-vyar shaadi ke do-tin saal mai khatam ho jata hai, baccha hai jo ek pati patni ko sath me bandh rakhte hai"...such an obnoxiously regressive thought...!!!

And, Ishita is doing the same thing knowingly or unknowingly. Plz don't say the cliche thing that Ruhi is the base of their relationship. Does that mean without Ruhi, IshRa won't survive? Love between two people should be more than enough to continue a relationship. I wonder whether CVs have thought what they are showing now, if kid is so important to continue a marriage; it's only proving Subbu's point and the funny thing is that Ishita is saying so who once was abandoned for the same reason.

PS--I mentioned DT as she gave the IV and it was not her idea. She was just explaining CVs point of view.

I have d same thought...ishita subbu ko mila do wahi accha hai ...ek jaise soch hai accha rahega

LOL...lecture didi Ishita ke paas itna dimag kah jo wo sochegi...😆

I have always said Ishita's loves towards Raman is strings attached. She loves Raman, not as an individual but as Ruhi's papa. She believes there is no IshRa or will be no IshRa if Ruhi isn't there. Glad that things are getting more clear now. 😆 I didn't expect it from Ishita though as she was once the victim of it.

We,viewers, won't think much regarding this issue coz we are very happy with the lollipops thrown at us!

i don't get what your point is... I don't hear her expressing her hatred for Subbu.

Originally posted by: brainychild92

i don't get what your point is... I don't hear her expressing her hatred for Subbu.

And if anything, Ishita adopted Ruhi, so Subbu could've too. Whatever though... She does not blame him, at least not anymore.

The only thing I blame Subbu for is his mother. Can he not control her better? He got married right? And he father's at least one kid? Then why is his mother in Ishita's face all of the time. He didn't want to marry her fine; he doesn't love her, great; but at least respect that time/commitment enough to keep at least your mother out of her face.

Again, Subbu is only guilty of disrespecting a woman. not because he left her; he was going to leave eventually, but he could have kept her dignity intact by keeping his mother away.

I am sorry but I couldn't understand head or tail of your reply. Maybe you didn't understand my topic n its content.

Since when I said Ishita hates Subbu or he is a bad guy?!! I said Ishita and Subbu possess the same thought that a marriage can NOT sustain without a child.

If adi's and ruhi' custody go to shagun in future... do u think raman would be able to be happy with ishita alone? I feel for both of them kids r first priority. Adi for raman and ruhi for ishita

Very true... I was thinking on the same lines... Ishita herself is putting a stamp on the professed words of Subbu, due to which she was abandoned, thus justifying him.

Originally posted by: appuss

If adi's and ruhi' custody go to shagun in future... do u think raman would be able to be happy with ishita alone? I feel for both of them kids r first priority. Adi for raman and ruhi for ishita

Well, your point is hypothetical where Ishita is proving her point. Adi was not needed for Raman to love Ishita, in fact Adi hated Ishita yet Raman fell in love with her. And, he never said or did any act that suggests he will not love Ishita if Adi wasn't there.

And, if we assume your hypothetical point to be true that doesn't negate Ishita's double standard.

Priority is not an issue here. Rather the "only priority" is the issue.

I am actually finding it hard to believe Ishita's POV since the kids swapping drama started as her POV somehow matches and up to certain point justifies Subbu's chain of thought.I blame CVs for being such delusional fools that they thought viewers wouldn't have noticed it.

I agree, kids are important and parents always make them their first priorities but that doesn't mean without them, a marriage won't survive. Then what's the point of showing Yeh Hai Mohabbatein which professes that even an infertile woman can find love in marriage? Kids are symbols of love but they are not the love itself. Love is and should be independent of these things.

totally agree with you...