raising the bar of performance

dear famegurukul addicts,

after watching fame gurukul show i have come to this conclusion:

remember arijit in the beginning?how he sang the best but his presentation on the stage was the worst?i mean in terms of dance , body language, and facial expressions and the lack of feel in the song? well later on before his exit i felt he had blossomed into a much livelier performer. he had to do it cause qazi was performing awesome and the indian janta saw this and so voted for qazi.in a way i think everyone in the gurukul has shown improvemnet in stage performance in order to compete witn qazi.so i think qazi has made everyone raise their level of showmanshiip.just as they made him improve his singing . what do you guys think?

Definately - that's what happens in competition: either you improve your lacking qualities to either match or out-do your competitors, or you sink like the Titanic.

I remember how JA used to say that Arijit needed to learn how to hold the mic - in the last performance, he held it like he'd being doing it all his life..

my point was and is that---they should thank qazi for raising the bar on presentation and showmanship instead of avoiding him and as arpiita suggested that he should not have made it into the final four.look at a tennis tournament .the strongest and weakest compete.over the course of a tournament we see one of the strongest players ousted and that upset becones sensational .same here .you can never predict.