Hell yeah Rajnath was the root cause crook!

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

not.here

@not.here

Inactive

Posted: 11 years ago

#31

Originally posted by: atominis
Arya

When a man truly loves a woman he does not make her his mistress or use her to be sycophant of his wife.

If you sleep around with others and marry someone else on any pretext it is not love.

nope. it is some twisted lust.

Quote

tanvismile

@tanvismile

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#32

Originally posted by: atominis

Havr I named anyone that you simply quote me and my posts?

BTW dear if Rajnath had genuine emotions for Raima then he would not be sleeping with Sakshi and other women.

You still think he was genuine? So be it.

I have clarified often that all are bad. This Sakshi is more disgusting or Rajnath is less disgusting debate is beyond me!

Lastly 2 more users msde topics on Rajnath and shippers. Yet you only quote and call out on me? Why so selective? Rather you people like to corner only one user.

Your genuine Rajnath killed brother Arnab and is now using own daughter Kangana against Basu. And it is he who got Sakshi to kill Rehmat. Wait for that revelation. You may still call him less disgusting or genuine or whatever.

Ya lets wait for revelation... Well if u remember it was sakshi who recalls raj "did u remember the incident where the press /office of rehmat shaik got burnt,rehmat and akram died it was done by me"he seems shocked

why would she tell him that if he only was the one to order to kill rehmat. It doesn't make sense right

what kind of lady who just kill hubby on some else s order?

Now coming to you, which other posts u were talking about?

I have seen you mocking other groups, u give names like rajnath sympathisers, trp aunties.. don't you! I understand u don't agree with us but that doesn't mean u taunt others, u mock others thinking.And how does it matter what others think. And even some fans who loved dev durga, I understand you don't watch this show for love story but some people watch it for love story, they admire dev durga, there also ur same attitude

I totally understood u when u were furious when some people shipped shaurya durga, u belittled their thinking, it's was understood but the in rest of cases, it just not done.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

642126

Hibernated

Posted: 11 years ago

#33

I talked of revelation because it is based on Revenge. And that is how story goes.

I did not mock anyone. Sorry but DurSha shippers got open letters from other users too. That is because Shaurya was a rapist. And there were posts accusing Payal of faking it and Shaurya being innocent despite his crime proven.

I sure was not the only one who commented!

Regarding DevGa, I have never commented on their fans. Only commented on loopholes in Dev's story. I rarely talk about them as a jodi.

TRP aunties is a general term used all over IF. And by many users here also. I am not the only one to use it nor did I specifically name anyone in that group.

Taunting others is what you and some others are doing by specifically quoting only me or naming me or calling out to me or taking my posts out of context. I do not go around naming people or quoting selective parts of their posts to target them the way you are doing.

Getting personal is not my cup of tea. Here you guys come to topics and get personal.

Lastly, what kind of lady? Well she was in love with Rajnath at that time so she did it. Just as lady Raima cheated on her own husband Jatin and got him bashed too in Rajnath's love. I wonder what kind of lady cheats on her husband like this? Same issue applies to both characters.

I cannot believe we are debating who is less bad or more bad in characters like slimy Goenkas!

I always maintain they are all equally bad.

Finally, please keep to show and topic. If you take every word personally even if it is not directed at you then it is not my problem.

Quote

not.here

@not.here

Inactive

Posted: 11 years ago

#34

If people watch this show for a love story that was randomly introduced and in my personal opinion was not needed then fine but the essence of the show is getting justice for a girl who was raped and denied justice by a horrible family. It does not matter what kind of man or woman raj and sakshi are or who is better or worse. they are both terrible manipulators and killers for whatever reason they have. the focus of the show should have stayed with that girl and not detoured. Viewers should be hoping payal gets justice and durga delivers with or without dev. The romances are a side addition, again in my opinion, and if people want romance then they are free to watch a show which deals with romance and less grey characters. They are also free to watch EHT and comment on the Jodi they like but they have to be okay with other people not sharing their point of view about the Jodi or even romance with supported reasons that should be acknowledged.

As for terminology. I have seen TRP Aunty used in many forums. There have been no problems. Could anyone suggest another name that they feel is better in that case. A politically correct one that describes the large majority which happen to be women who like certain shows with certain themes and therefore contribute to its TRP? That could be established as the norm to avoid hurting sentiments. Everyone's view is different and they should be able to express it constructively which so far I have seen happen by many people on both sides. I personally would still respect the views of those who think the opposite of me.

Last but not least if there is a major problem then the moderator is there to be used anonymously instead.

Quote

anwesha rath

@Anurulz

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#35

Good Lord, since wen is the term trp aunty a derogatory one? Has it been mentioned in any rule of IF? it is a very common term used in innumerable forums on this site..and as far as the posts on rajnath and sakshi are concerned, is this the only post created for it? As of yest, no less than 3 diff threads have been created for the same..why target this particular one? And if there had not been posts regarding rajnaths innocence and his "love" for raima, there wud not have been rebuttals..there are many scenes and episodes on varied crimes of this character but people defend him..and consequently there are posts which point out those very crimes..why is tht taken to be a personal attack? On the other hand, repeated quoting of a members posts, pointing to her viewpoint is not a personal attack? Funny how tht worked out...anybody has an issue with a member posts, then report it instead of attacking this member..

Quote

dey.bh

@dey.bh

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

#36

Tanvi,

First of all TRP aunty is an informal word used almost everywhere these days. Not IF but every other forum has it. Its neither abusive nor derogatory.

Secondly, Can you tell me on what grounds you find Rajnath loyal ? Because he cried for Raima in the hospital ? Without giving me the logic that its only a show tell me one can accept a man like Rajnath in real life ? He used Sakshi that too when he was committed to Raima. Where was his loyalty then ?

Thirdly, Yes Sakshi is a criminal for she killed her husband. So is Rajnath who killed his own brother. How is one better than the other ?

@ all : SO much of outcry because of the word ' Sympathizers' ? Where were all when one special thread was made to call those members as bashers who didn't find Dev a hero ?

The debate is about ethical and unethical portrayal of relationships. ITs not about EHT alone but everywhere the makers use the simple logic of 'true love' and get away with anything rubbish. One is free to think whatever they want but when make a show it should comply with the laws of the land and the society as a whole.

Now, can we all please stick to the objective of the thread. One who has problem with TM's post or any other post may please report instead of quoting each other. It unnecessarily disrupts the discussion.

Edited by dey.bh - 11 years ago

Quote

642126

Hibernated

Posted: 11 years ago

#37

You are so right Debs!

When a newcomer came and made a thread and called us bashers and even named us in her posts then no one commented! Naming and quoting is targetting and attacking or using general words is attack?

I wonder how people ignore topic and get personal instead.

I also see how nobody reacts against blatantly racist and abusive posts here but only TRP aunty has elicited comment.

I can post links of old threads in which a user had called all those people psycho who said Shaurya was a rapist. No action was taken on those threads.

We do not use words like these. This is what defines attacks. But no one calls out on those threads!

Better report to mods if you find anything problematic than deviate topics with personal remarks like this.

Quote

cherrypansy

@cherrypansy

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

#38

Completely agree with you...he slept with Sakshi and then said no to marriage with her...( although Sakshi is no less...at that time she was also married)...this action of him decided their future...Although Sakshi married him...but it seems she never trusted him and knew her only security was her son. Even if RN had divorced her, she would have enjoyed the Goenka power through Shaurya...and so Sakshi gave him all what he wanted without putting a check.

Quote

tanvismile

@tanvismile

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#39

Originally posted by: atominis
I talked of revelation because it is based on Revenge. And that is how story goes.
I did not mock anyone. Sorry but DurSha shippers got open letters from other users too. That is because Shaurya was a rapist. And there were posts accusing Payal of faking it and Shaurya being innocent despite his crime proven.

I sure was not the only one who commented!

Regarding DevGa, I have never commented on their fans. Only commented on loopholes in Dev's story. I rarely talk about them as a jodi.

TRP aunties is a general term used all over IF. And by many users here also. I am not the only one to use it nor did I specifically name anyone in that group.

Taunting others is what you and some others are doing by specifically quoting only me or naming me or calling out to me or taking my posts out of context. I do not go around naming people or quoting selective parts of their posts to target them the way you are doing.

Getting personal is not my cup of tea. Here you guys come to topics and get personal.

Lastly, what kind of lady? Well she was in love with Rajnath at that time so she did it. Just as lady Raima cheated on her own husband Jatin and got him bashed too in Rajnath's love. I wonder what kind of lady cheats on her husband like this? Same issue applies to both characters.

I cannot believe we are debating who is less bad or more bad in characters like slimy Goenkas!

I always maintain they are all equally bad.

Finally, please keep to show and topic. If you take every word personally even if it is not directed at you then it is not my problem.

taunting you is what I do! Seriously I don't make posts criticizing others thinking! Naming other viewers as rajnath sympathisers! Even in posts there were statements like"still people think rajnath is innocent" and also "it s always women are blamed ", even when I made posts, mentioned that sakshi is going to be exposed; it was when nurse was about to get caught, that time u answered I want sakshi to expose to rajnath

Basically I have noted one thing that if anyone talks like it's rajnath is doing mind games with sakshi that's good, then u jump down with something like sakshi should expose those tapes. Basically u r of thinking that people like me are male biased and only blame sakshi. So u always make it sakshi v/s rajnath.. this is ur thinking and it's clearly visible from ur posts

But that's not true, I never supported raj raima untill the last confession by raima before the attack. Yes I like raj raima but that's a different issue.

Sakshi love for rajnath looked too small due to her act in front of raima who Stood fearlessly while taking the bullet.. If sakshi truly loved raj, she was suppose to question him, fight with him for breaking her heart but this women was busy making plans, killing raima then putting blame on dev, faking and manipulating raj.All she is bothered about is goenka status. NOthing else matters.I was sakshi sympathiser when she came to know the truth but it went down the drain when went to kill her.

Quote

642126

Hibernated

Posted: 11 years ago

#40

@piyualka

I have never said Sakshi is any less. She was a calculator too. What I pointed out was that Rajnath is no less. That is all.

@tanvismile

I do not make it Sakshi vs Rajnath. I only reply to those posts that use words like "than" and paint one villain lesser than other. And I am sorry but a bias is there because cheating of man and murders by man are small loyalty issues or still not confirmed etc. Whereas woman character is the only one to be bashed.

I remember a post by you even before flashbacks were shown and RajMa affair was on, that Sakshi deserved to be cheated. Though Rajnath was no less bad. What does it imply then?

Let me make it clear it is not only directed at you alone. I saw many comments on other sites and hence made an observation. I often mention it. So why do you take it on yourself?

When I say Sakshi should expose Rajnath I say it because both are equally bad. Rajnath has no higher ground over her.

I am not a Sakshi sympathiser. Nor do I see philandering as love. (Not in case of Sakshi nor in case of Rajnath)

So let's end it here.

Edited by atominis - 11 years ago