Why Shaurya has to be a Goenka

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

dey.bh

@dey.bh

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

#11

Originally posted by: pretty_h
im sorry if you hurt but i just feel he may be
that why shared nothing more it just a show anything can happen that why
i said it sorry again

Why are you sorry ? Please feel free to share your opinion here.

As for just a show, I believe in rationality. Anything rational, logical and practical is and should be encouraged even if it is a show.

Quote

EverEnigmatic

@EverEnigmatic

Inactive

Posted: 11 years ago

#12

I am kind of new here but can I post my opinion too

I don't think shaurya is that khan son. As someone said he doesnt even have little ounce of goodness in him to consider some nice person son. Even if we think it is due to upbringing he has become like that - then also when she married rajnath there should have been a scandal that she is already pregnant. Gonekas were shown super rich then also

I feel that the person whom sakshi loved is Arnab - may sound hilarious but I feel so. She should have been in brief affair too. But may be Arnab was not insterstered or may be he is committed to his lady. Sakshi said she has loved once, if she has loved rajnath himself she should have said I loved u once and trusted u. If his affairs made her like that then how can raima affair would affect her, so I want to rule out that possibility

To add more spice i feel that shaurya is Arnab and sakshi son, so what she is so possessive. Kangana on the other hand is rajnath daughter - she is not much interested in her. May be rajnath too dont the secret so what he is too possessive too thinking that he is his child

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

dey.bh

@dey.bh

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

#13

@ pretty: Okay now I got why this sorry was for. Look you made a thread about why Shaurya can be Rehmat's son and I made why he cannot be one. Yes, I agree it was a reaction to your post but it was nothing negative about it. I just wanted a separate thread to be specific about my points So please feel free to share whatever you didn't share before.

We both have our own logic and we are ought to share it here. Nothing to say sorry about it.

Quote

Dolly-heart

@Dolly-heart

Sparkler

Posted: 11 years ago

#14

I agree Debby that Shaurya is definitely a spawn of two bad genes.

Shakshi and Rajnath fit the bill nicely.

Shakshi without a second thought killed Rehmat and his son Akram and left and never looked back.

If she had been pregnant with the man she killed she in her ambition to climb to money heights she would have aborted the child.

So if you want to say that Shaurya is not her and Rajnath's biological son, then the only thing that would make sense is that Shaurya is the son of the man she had loved before meeting Rajnath who was either a Don or an Evil man she chose to leave and give her son a better name and status in life.

But Shaurya is Shakshi's son and that she has proven by overlooking his evil and rotten behaviour all his life.

Shakshi would not love anyone or anything as much as she does Shaurya. He is her greatest weakness.

And that she feels this special bond with him is only due to the fact that she physically

carried him for 9 months and gave birth to him.

So yes ,Shaurya is a Goenka with all the soiled blood lineage from his Evil mother and his money hungry father Rajnath .