Considering how Sakshi is doing it, its very low and cheap way to do so.
However, practically speaking its Dayal who should have said this. He didn't because he knows the marriage is fake but this wayy the could have proved Sakshi that he has nothing to do with the attack.
Sakshi is right, any girl would have cancelled the marriage after Shaurya was paralyzed. THis is the utmost practical thing to do and say. I know Sex life is not the only thing in marriage but as we know divorces do happen on the basis of dissatisfaction of sexual life as per the law. Therefore, this valid point cannot be discarded with the logic of saccha pyar and bharosa
Besides, apart from a few epic examples, people do marry to produce children. Wrong or right is not the question here.
I found Sakshi's way of breaking her son way too cheap and to even recollect those scenes gives me a weird feeling. The way she bought the journalist, the way she let the escort humiliate Shaurya and the way she made a deal with Karan. Her obsession is Durga. HOw to keep Durga away and to get that she will do anything. Its like no more about Shaurya, its all about defeating Durga now.
If I were Sakshi and the question was about Shaurya, I would have arranged a meeting with the Thakurs and ask them to postpone the marriage . Then ssk Durga to prove she loves Shaurya. Ask her to wait for another 2 years to marry Shaurya. You nail your enemy without hurting your son. BUT no, Son has nothing to do here, its about breaking Durga now and if it means hurting Shaurya SO BE IT
What a woman !!!