JUDGES?Really? - Page 2

Originally posted by: medha16

i think many of you are right when u said that the whole concept n act wise akshat was better...but isn't d show about dance at the end of the day?

TJ's act was not very unique but performance wise I also feel TJ was much better...why has suddenly concept n other extra things taken more importance than what d show is all about?

akshat did a good job with the dancing but i cant honestly put him before TJ n many here seem to agree with me i can see...

I'm disappointed with the way the show has evolved over the years...normally things get better but here the opposite is happening with every passing season.

there is too much focus on which seems like the dreaded word now -'entertainment', too much commercialization n everything else comes before than wat the show is actually all about!

honestly, yesterday i was appalled...people used to make fun of nach baliye n now i see even seasoned judges n ace choreographers like remo r no better than that brain-dead sajid khan.

why do i get the feeling that the whole thing was totally staged? it was pre-decided who will stay n who will go even before the acts were performed.

after TJ n akshat performed, remo said that compared to akshat's grandiose act, popo fell short...but how was he to know before popo's performance that akshat's act would be more umm dramatic coz popo performed first...she was flawless in her dancing...he never pointed out any mistakes in her dance...then why was she eliminated n not akshat who was pretty clumsy?

his act may be superb...but akshat is the contestant n not vaishnavi...it would have been justified if she red more over popo but i can't still digest how akshat's individual performance was better than TJ's perfect lines n postures!