The Biggest blooper of all TV Dramas

Page

hope

@gothope

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

If anyone noticed Sharda was carrying a Michael Kors Purse and that too a tote. Totes for MK range anywhere from $300 to $800. Convert that into indian rupees in today's date that is a tote in India will range anywhere from 20,000 rupees to 50,000. Being as "poor" as they are it's amazing how they can afford that. Plus 2 iphones and a smart phone. plus all the little house decor they have in their house. And this blooper so to say is not just in ENP it's almost all indian dramas.

Quote

Frequent Posters

Ridzi

@Ro-001

Dazzler

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

Hahaha I know
Even I told this to my mom.
Bahus wear so much jewelry and heavy sarees worth in thousands but still they live in a small house and struggling to get money
But at the end its a drama and it will have bloopers

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

guenhwyvar

@guenhwyvar

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

Well ... Sharda did steal that Saraswati murthi from her old house... (that scene still makes me laugh) ... so she probably just believes that whatever she took from that house was hers to belong with - all those clothes, etc - from her POV. Obviously, all that stuff was never hers to begin with, but she still wears the sindur and mangal sutra so in some bizarre sense, I think it self justifies what she wears?

Quote

u4tlu

@u4tlu

Explorer

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: shyam09
Well ... Sharda did steal that Saraswati murthi from her old house... (that scene still makes me laugh) ... so she probably just believes that whatever she took from that house was hers to belong with - all those clothes, etc - from her POV. Obviously, all that stuff was never hers to begin with, but she still wears the sindur and mangal sutra so in some bizarre sense, I think it self justifies what she wears?

Do you mean to say whatever jewelry Sharda wears from "that house" does not belong to her?

All that jewelry might be what Suresh Modi bought for her in all these years?

Can Latika , Karan, Chirag "go back" into the womb or be just "not born"?

Who does the jewelry "belong" to ? And Saraswati murti is from "that house" but Sharda lived in "that house" all these years.

The "house" may have been "taken" over by Pallavi. Definitely not all the stuff from there.

Why does Suresh Modi "continue" to live there? Pallavi's husband is Mahesh AJmera. And he does not exist. Only Suresh Modi exists. and he should leave the house Shouldn't he?

Quote

Pallavi

@paljay

Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: u4tlu

Do you mean to say whatever jewelry Sharda wears from "that house" does not belong to her?

All that jewelry might be what Suresh Modi bought for her in all these years?

Can Latika , Karan, Chirag "go back" into the womb or be just "not born"?

Who does the jewelry "belong" to ? And Saraswati murti is from "that house" but Sharda lived in "that house" all these years.

The "house" may have been "taken" over by Pallavi. Definitely not all the stuff from there.

Why does Suresh Modi "continue" to live there? Pallavi's husband is Mahesh AJmera. And he does not exist. Only Suresh Modi exists. and he should leave the house Shouldn't he?

😆😆

Edited by paljay - 11 years ago

Quote

Pallavi

@paljay

Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

@ TM

It's not a blooper, Sharda was rich, she can't throw her things, jewelry, sarees, purse etc and buy cheaper one just to show that she is poor.

Edited by paljay - 11 years ago

Quote

Pallavi

@paljay

Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: shyam09
Well ... Sharda did steal that Saraswati murthi from her old house... (that scene still makes me laugh) ... so she probably just believes that whatever she took from that house was hers to belong with - all those clothes, etc - from her POV. Obviously, all that stuff was never hers to begin with, but she still wears the sindur and mangal sutra so in some bizarre sense, I think it self justifies what she wears?

Why Sindoor?

Now a days bindi, sindoor etc are just fashion symbols, no one takes it seriously except TV shows.

I am married but I do not wear Sindoor or Mangalsutra, does that mean i am not married?

Quote

u4tlu

@u4tlu

Explorer

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: paljay

Why Sindoor?

Now a days bindi, sindoor etc are just fashion symbols, no one takes it seriously except TV shows.

I am married but I do not wear Sindoor or Mangalsutra, does that mean i am not married?

Just like some married women do not wear bindi or sindoor even though religion says one should wear these same way Sharda Modi can wear not wear Sindoor mangalsutra according to her wish. Sharda was married to Suresh Modi for thirty five long years. Or she believed that she was married to him as per religion all these years. In this trust and thought she used to wear Sindoor and mangal sutra all these years.

She lived as Suresh Modi's wife. and Suresh Modi earned all these years. Raised a family of three kids. All the stuff Sharda owned her personal belongings and jewelry are her own even as Suresh Modi's wife. Suresh Modi right now may not be the "legal" husband of Sharda Modi but what she owned as personal belongings are hers those gifted by her husband and those bought by herself as her husband's wife. She took all those and came out of the house. It is her wish. She could have even fought to live in the house. IMHO. Pallavi cannot chase her out. Sharda owned businesses too.

Now Pallavi says she is the legal "correct" wife. Sharda thought she was the "legal" correct wife of Suresh Modi. It is not her fault Suresh Modi cheated both women.

Now she walked out on Suresh Modi . Now wearing Sindoor not wearing Sindoor is each person's choice. Marriage took place according to religion. Why should she stop wearing Sindoor? Anyway what is anybody's problem how Sharda dresses up? She does not become "single" and "free" or some such thing. Again it is Sharda's wish how she dresses up. Viewers need not pick on her for wearing Sindoor.

Edited by u4tlu - 11 years ago