tale of two homes

Amol not found. And Ira get angry at Shiv. Shiv gets angry at the inspector. And the inspector starts action rounding up criminals. Kids spreading awareness of amol's kidnapping though cute is not safe. They are kids and they should just wait as there are others who are paid to do that job.

I am relieved that sanchi turned a new leaf. Otherwise she would have gloated. Their idea is not bad.
Payal's and sanchi's.

Kanchan's problems. Jagya talks about surrogacy. But who will become surrogate mother? Basant argued with dadisa which is usually rare. Kanchan's story started to interest me just the way Phooli's story did. Now they are going to tackle surrogacy. Lets wait and watch.

The gangster lady seems to be a good entrepreneur. Very fast and very sharp.

I liked Ira's angry outburst. 'You cant find a child and how will you manage the district as a Collector?'

Shiv looked disinterested.

It was beautiful and somewhat sad to see anandi's bond with amol.

Children distributing pamphlets was to show how much they want to do for their friend - but it is risky, especially at traffic signals without any adult supervision - these friends also ran the risk of getting kidnapped themselves or some accident etc. But the scene was cute.

They may ultimately show surrogacy for Kanchan, but it looks hypocrisy on part of DS - when her own grand daughter-in-law needed surrogacy - she was trying to find other ways, went to some pandit also. Kanchan has no other way than surrogacy or adoption - but why to show that she needs to become a mother any which way. Having children is not necessary for women.

Originally posted by: SPuja

They may ultimately show surrogacy for Kanchan, but it looks hypocrisy on part of DS - when her own grand daughter-in-law needed surrogacy - she was trying to find other ways, went to some pandit also. Kanchan has no other way than surrogacy or adoption - but why to show that she needs to become a mother any which way. Having children is not necessary for women.

They did not let any girl or boy single - not even the widow or divorcees - so it is difficult to imagine they will let some woman without a child and happy. Regarding adoption within family- I have seen cases where it did not go well. Mostly there is too much comparison of parenting style and the adopted child is constantly compared to his/her biological siblings. In some cases as mentioned in above post - the biological parent may even want the child back. It is better if the adopted child is an orphan - this way - a child without parents and parents without a child can find happiness.

In many western countries, single men and women adopt pets and shower love and care on them. But in India, the tradition is vansh ko aage badna. To carry the family name forward and sometimes it should also be their son's blood and genes. And the entire burden and guilt falls one the hapless woman. It is not enough for her to produce a child but it should also be male child in most cases.

I can see Kanchan's problems complicated if the surrogate mother starts claiming the child or blackmailing for more money. Better Kanchan divorce the man who seems to be rather soft and who may not stand up against parental pressure. She can pursue studies, find some career and if destined meet a man who does not mind her being childless.

Adoption in Kanchan's case is out of the question because the mother in law thinks her son is capable of having kids and why he should forego that privilege just to keep Kanchan as his wife. She must be thinking of second marriage for him.

Kanchan track is very poorly written and is spreading misinformation. Nowhere in the world they remove the uterus as soon as it is confirmed that there is tumor in it. Looks like one of the leads is a doctor so they think they should always show medical emergencies. Why not a medical condition and then a realistic treatment? Because they have to do research to show what are the possible treatments?

Originally posted by: SPuja

Kanchan track is very poorly written and is spreading misinformation. Nowhere in the world they remove the uterus as soon as it is confirmed that there is tumor in it. Looks like one of the leads is a doctor so they think they should always show medical emergencies. Why not a medical condition and then a realistic treatment? Because they have to do research to show what are the possible treatments?

The hurried approach is because they are interested to show saas bahu and surrogacy.