Let's look at the evidence.... - Page 6

Originally posted by: prettypri

Hi Eve...

I wanted to reply to your original post but saw this and agreed completely with it so replying to this one first!

Completely agree on the seeing things from one POV part..

When paro was on the wrong side viewers knew it and yet she was an innocent caught in the situation and rudra was wrong.

Now when it's his father dying and he has every right to believe the evidence in front of him he is supposed to trust paro because she is paro??? Because he knows her??? Huh???

When she hit him weren't there protests that it was perfectly right and he should not feel betrayed because he never trusted her??

Then what trust are we talking about here?

He has been called inhuman for not letting paro go.. Now he behaved like any other human and he is being slammed for that also.. Weird!

Paro coming back is no indication that she could not have acted out of desperation when she left.. Beore she knew tejawsts truth she was desperate and blindly hated rudra..

Rudra can totally logically believe that.. He can even wonder if she is trying to save herself by going directly to BSD against tejawat now!

She saved him in the mela... that was a spontaneous reaction.. She also hit him on the head and said she will not let him harm her own.. Isn't he supposed to remember that??

The man went after her even after that hit...!

Originally posted by: surabi

No we cannot expect that here... there will only be a few of us here like that... They have not even shown the episode but if you look at the forum, there are 100 posts about the same... hmmm...

Originally posted by: Exprimere

Main bataun problem kya hai? The thing is Rudra is seen in transient states of intelligence and being dense.