Page
of
1🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: S 8 - M43: India vs South Afrika🏏
🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: S 8 - Match 44: WI vs ZIMBABWE🏏
CHUNNI BURNT 🔥 23.2
Gen 5 Manifestation and Prayer and Wish Thread
Rashmika and Vijay Wedding Thread
VDAY FACE OFF 24.2
YRF Rejects Alpha OTT Offer
The Great yrkkh Poll(Open for all)
🏏India Women tour of Australia 2026: 1st ODI in Brisbane🏏
so it means if shakuni were not there with dury...thn too dury wud b like this only...egoistic..ambitious...selfish...Originally posted by: india2050
There are many versions of Mahabharat available, some text but many word of mouth. It depends on which version one wants to believe.
Reading between the lines in the KMG translated text one will find that Shakuni had a lesser role to play than his generally accepted depiction nowadaysAs per the text he is involved only in Lakshagrah and the Game of Dice. For Lakshagrah it was Dhrit pressurized by the other politicians in the court who asks Shakuni to come up with some plan. On his own he was hardly planning to do anything.Before the game of dice he actually advises Dury not to be jealous of Pandavas and be happy with his portion. It was Dury who knew no peace of mind and hence the suggestion to defeat Yudi through dice instead of outright war.Regarding poisoning Bheem and going to the forest to mock the Pandavas, as per KMG Shakuni was not involved. In the balance Dury would still have been bad but any overt action would have met with quick opposition and Dury most likely would have self-destructed.