Neither Ahem/Gopi are right, and CVs showed it!

Today, I liked how the CVs showed both Ahem and Gopi as being selfish, and neither of them being the "right" one. 👏 I was afraid the CVs would support Gopi's stance and give the message to viewers that a father's love is secondary to a mother's, but instead, the CVs portrayed both Ahem and Gopi to be selfish parents who think about themselves more than their child, with Vidya slowly backing off looking dejected. That scene was just so powerful and portrayed the pain of their child really well. I hope both come to a realization that a child cannot live with just one parent. It needs both, and they'll just have to compromise if they want Vidya to be truly happy.

Yes. That seems true. At the end of the day, the CVs have to unite Ahem and Gopi😉 Maligning Ahem too much or making Gopi completely mahaan will not make the cut now because Gopi is being shown as someone who has grown to become strong and independent atleast to a certain extent.

Whether by design or luck, the CVs have kinda maintained the facts that do not completely jeopardize either Ahem or Gopi's future reunion..

For one, Gopi is shown missing her family and husband and worrying for heir safety periodically.
Ahem seemed to be in dilemma until the CVs gave a small glimpse of him having Gopi's photo with him.

Ahem was shown not liking Radha or the marriage proposal. The CVs found a way out by making him agree to Kokila under duress

If they make Ahem a total blackguard, then there is no way he can be reconciled with Gopi in the future. They cannot also make Gopi completely into a doormat letting Ahem take Vidya because she is seen more as a mother now.

So balance, and an eye on the future.. Hmm.. The CVs do have a real reason being on the middle line all the time😆

where i live I have seen 2 parents getting along and sharing their child even if they are not together... and I have also seen the worst ... OMG ...

no offence to anyone but i am a totally selfish mother, i was told we couldnt have kids i emphasis on "WE" i was devastated but through prayers and medical help i finally concieved triplets i miscarriage one, now i have 4 daughters my hubby travels a lot so i am with them most of the time i have made it quite clear to hubby if we ever split i take all 😳😆 and he knows it . i will give him visitation rights but hell my children staying with me

Originally posted by: suk19

no offence to anyone but i am a totally selfish mother, i was told we couldnt have kids i emphasis on "WE" i was devastated but through prayers and medical help i finally concieved triplets i miscarriage one, now i have 4 daughters my hubby travels a lot so i am with them most of the time i have made it quite clear to hubby if we ever split i take all 😳😆 and he knows it . i will give him visitation rights but hell my children staying with me

as a mother i can understand gopis view but she is saying to ahem tht he can visit when ever he likes

Originally posted by: ..RamKiJanaki..

But is that the mother's decision to make? What about the child's needs and wishes? After all, the mother would not have those kids without the sperm of the father, so it's not like she conceived by herself. In cases of divorce or separation, the court makes the decision who makes the kids and who gets visitation rights. In most cases, kids live with both parents, one week with one parent and one week with another parent. Unless the court receives evidence that one parent is neglecting or abusing the kids, they do get equal right to them. It's not the parent's choice to make, it's the court's.

So I do think it was completely selfish of Gopi to say that she'll keep her kid and Ahem can visit if he wants to. What about Vidya's wishes? Neither of them were thinking about Vidya, they were only thinking about themselves.

it should never be the courts it should be both parents, my hubby knows girls are not going to stay with him as he is in n out of their life hence their is no issue. she was wrong in not informing Ahem about pregnancy n child but in the long run vidya will need her mother not that she doesnt need ahem but courts will generally give to perfer mother over father

Originally posted by: suk19

it should never be the courts it should be both parents, my hubby knows girls are not going to stay with him as he is in n out of their life hence their is no issue. she was wrong in not informing Ahem about pregnancy n child but in the long run vidya will need her mother not that she doesnt need ahem but courts will generally give to perfer mother over father