Is Paro's testimony enough?? - Page 2

Originally posted by: Sofna

Also Paro never saw who fired the first shot. She was unconscious most of the way.

the shootout started when paro was still conscious...she did see rudra firing only after one of his men was shot down...while searching her stuff.

Originally posted by: libran90

After so many episodes have gone by...one thing remains the same..."Paro's testimony"...According to Rudra,Paro is the sole witness of this 'Border hatyakaand'...and we know that Paro knows zilch...But if she signs some ridiculous papers,she is free to go and move on and Tejawat will burn...
Definitely,Tejawat should burn...but is Paro's testimony enough??...Rudra's superiors want proof that what Rudra did that day was justifiable,that they were not innocent civilians,but armed and loaded terrorists...
But,i still think Rudra needs much more than just Paro's testimony...What do you guys feel??

Originally posted by: DoJin

the shootout started when paro was still conscious...she did see rudra firing only after one of his men was shot down...while searching her stuff.

I knw she was conscious till he pointed a gun at her. Unless they show Paro recapping those moments we do not know exactly what she did or didn't see. As the bride she was huddled n looking down as far as I cn rmmbr.