Maha boring Puru

Page

Next Last

luckySnow

@luckySnow

Dazzler

Posted: 7 years ago

Fictional character Puru is irritating as hell...Looks like chadakchaap, not any prince. 😆

Quote

Frequent Posters

Priya

@Priya258

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 7 years ago

Now I started disliking his part.

Har cheez ki had hoti h

Bar jagah mera bharat niyati blah blah digest nai hota

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

486792

Hibernated

Posted: 7 years ago

Now can you please give it a break?? Alright Puru's track is not upto the mark.But this is plain character bashing.

He had that Dasyu outfit ever since the show began and no one had any problems with it.

If we have any disappointment with his track then we should contact the writers.

Bashing him in the forum is only gonna cause negativity

Quote

siyarati

@siyarati

Inactive

Posted: 7 years ago

Originally posted by: --BlackSheep--
Now can you please give it a break?? Alright Puru's track is not upto the mark.But this is plain character bashing.
He had that Dasyu outfit ever since the show began and no one had any problems with it.
If we have any disappointment with his track then we should contact the writers.
Bashing him in the forum is only gonna cause negativity

I totally agree.👏 plz guys stop causing negativity about the show😡

Quote

sashashyam

@sashashyam

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 7 years ago

I see nothing wrong with the critiquing of characters. It is the actors that one is not allowed to criticise, according to the IF rules, which too seems odd to me, for all reviews of any film criticise the actors too. Anyway, the IF rules are the IF rules and there is no point fighting them.

However, if a character irritates someone, that person is surely free to voice that irritation. Those not sharing that negative opinion are equally free to defend the character. But this is not an AT or a fan club, so one cannot object to such criticism.

The thing is that Puru has no serious defenders that I could see, except the eloquent Ankita (BrienneOfTarth). Odd!

Also, I doubt very much if approaching the writers - and I personally have no idea how to do that - would make any difference.

Shyamala Cowsik

Edited by sashashyam - 7 years ago

Quote

siyarati

@siyarati

Inactive

Posted: 7 years ago

Originally posted by: sashashyam
I see nothing wrong with the critiquing of characters. It is the actors that one is not allowed to criticise, according to the IF rules, which too seems odd to me, for all reviews of any film criticise the actors too. Anyway, the IF rules are the IF rules and there is no point fighting them.
However, if a character irritates someone, that person is surely free to voice that irritation. Those not sharing that negative opinion are equally free to defend the character. But this is not an AT or a fan club, so one cannot object to such criticism.

The thing is that Puru has no serious defenders that I could see, except the eloquent Ankita (BrienneOfTarth). Odd!

Also, I doubt very much if approaching the writers - and I personally have no idea how to do that - would make any difference.

Shyamala Cowsik

Yeah.. But ek baar ho gyi criticism. Har topic me same hi baat, doesn't make any sense to me.

Quote

486792

Hibernated

Posted: 7 years ago

^^ Got the point😆

Henceforth I will try to defend him😉

But now even Character Bashing is against IF CoC if I am not wrong😊

I have got nothing against constructive criticism.But bashing is where the line needs to be drawn coz it creates unnecessary negativity.

This post was directed towards the character's appearance and also used terms like 'sadakchaap' and all.So I don't see how that's constructive criticism.

Also passing comments on the character's looks is also a comment directed towards the actor's looks.

The writers can be approached on Twitter and Insta.The entire team is very active on insta if I am not wrong.

Edited by --BlackSheep-- - 7 years ago

Quote

sashashyam

@sashashyam

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 7 years ago

You are going to have your work cut out for you!😉 But I am sure you will do a womanful job, and I will look out for your pro-Puru posts.

I agree that sadak chhap is coming it too strong, but fundamentally, the IF prefers to be a promotional platform for the shows rather than a platform for discussion.

This is a miniscule forum, but in the big ones like that for Jodha Akbar the goings on between the opposing fan groups was something to behold! Being no one's fan, I was an intrigued onlooker, and at times it was singularly unpleasant.

Shyamala Cowsik

Originally posted by: --BlackSheep--
^^ Got the point😆
Henceforth I will try to defend him😉

But now even Character Bashing is against IF CoC if I am not wrong😊

I have got nothing against constructive criticism.But bashing is where the line needs to be drawn coz it creates unnecessary negativity.

This post was directed towards the character's appearance and also used terms like 'sadakchaap' and all.So I don't see how that's constructive criticism.
Also passing comments on the character's looks is also a comment directed towards the actor's looks.

The writers can be approached on Twitter and Insta.The entire team is very active on insta if I am not wrong.

Edited by sashashyam - 7 years ago

Quote

siyarati

@siyarati

Inactive

Posted: 7 years ago

Originally posted by: sashashyam
You are going to have your work cut out for you!😉 But I am sure you will do a womanful job, and I will look out for your pro-Puru posts.

I agree that sadak chhap is coming it too strong, but fundamentally, the IF prefers to be a promotional platform for the shows rather than a platform for discussion.

This is a miniscule forum, but in the big ones like that for Jodha Akbar the goings on between the opposing fab groups was something to behold! Being no one's fan, I was an intrigued onlooker, and at times it was singularly unpleasant.

Shyamala Cowsik

Jodha Akbar was very stupid show. I don't know what people liked in it. Porus is far better than jodha akbad

Quote

sashashyam

@sashashyam

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 7 years ago

#10

I quit Jodha Akbar after 210 episodes, but for about 100 episodes it was very good, and Rajat Tokas too.

Now, to borrow the popular term in the IF, you are bashing it here, but I very much doubt if you would have done the same in the JA forum!😉 The results, in terms of the reactions of both the mods and the other members would have been, shall I say, disconcerting?

You are of course entitled to your opinion, but I would only point out that as far as stupidity in Porus goes, you have not seen anything yet, and we are only halfway! 😉 Curiously enough, there was a vishkanya in Jodha Akbar too. Or perhaps it was not curious at all!

Shyamala Cowsik