It is clear that the writers of this show are reading the comments on the forum and taking action to rectify the gaps that serve to support the IMMORAL storyline by rewriting history.
1. There have been number of comments on Adi's lack of wealth and therefore his lifestyle/actions being financed by TVS.
So we have rewriting of history to create Ma Thakur (MA) when from the beginning it has been clear that TVS's mother is dead (there is even a photo of a dead mother in one of the scenes)
The obvious reason is that with MA around the wealth is family wealth not TVS's and therefore Adi is not financially supported by TVS (even in though in the flashback when Adi was talking to Amu whilst waiting for TVS to come home after the wedding debacle he says TVS has bought him up and financed his and his mother's life)
It also be noted that when TVS confronted Jiji for Sugni and when Adi Sugni came back after sardhakai and Jiji was telling Sugni to use the servant's door both times TVS said this was his havali and he has the absolute right to make all of the decisions from paint on the wall to who stays in it. Do you really think if MA existed Jiji would have accepted that instead of pointing out that it is family havali.
Also if MA existed would Jiji have battled TVS regarding marrying Sugni (before Reva came back) without saying what would MA say or the fact that MA would never let a Bedni stay in the havali.
2. There have been number of comments about Sugni and G's motivation for marriage to Adi including that Sugni and G want marriage to a Thakur at any cost
So we have scene in 1 Oct episode where G tells Sugni:
- that you are brave because you have broken your own heart to save Reva's marriage
- that you should be proud that your action have/will broken/break the image that a Bedni is a home racker
- because you have sacrificed your love God has given you a Bedni a chance of a new life ' the respect of being a wife and Bahu and you should accept it with open arms
What is interesting about the above is that there is one member on the forum who has been expressing that very point on the forum for the last week or so. Either it's a coincidence or we have
member of a creative team putting comments on the forum.
Firstly Sugni's standpoint would be acceptable except that her action of accepting Adi's marriage proposal means that she has done exactly what she did not want to do ' ruin a thakurian's life because Adi was engaged to Amu who loves him (they were not married but it is still a destruction of their relationship). From the flashbacks its clear Adi cares about Amu. No of people have said that Amy is beautiful and will find someone else. Why should she? Why is it necessary to save Reva's marriage (which is dead as a door nail) but not Amu's relationship (which is very much alive)? If Amu can find someone why can't Reva? Reva is also a pretty lady and does not look more than 30.
Secondly please DO NOT use God to:
- send the message that the person who sacrifices is good and their actions are rewarded whereas someone who does not sacrifice is bad and will be punished; or
- endorse what anyone with common sense can see is wrong.
That is DISPICABLE.
Thirdly someone has said if Sugni leaves TVS will follow. Perhaps he will and if he does she will need to explain calmly her position and that if they are meant to be together then they will meet again under the right circumstances but in the meantime he needs to let her go and live her life on her terms. And she needs to keep saying it until he gets the message. It will be hard but damn sight easier than destroying lots of lives.
3. Re-establishing G and S's special relationship
There have been comments that the mother-daughter relationship that was shown at the beginning was beautiful/special. So again in 1 Oct episode we saw the relationship being re-established (the above conversation, the ring, the necklace).
Are we suppose to forget what G has been like for the last few months. I understand that she did everything to protect her daughter and I admire her sentiment but her actions were at times completely unbelievable.
This woman who could not raise her eyes and look at the Thakur who is the father of her daughter in the eye and ask him not to punish her (for dancing as Radha), was physically abusing, shouting, and screaming at TVS (who is a Thakur) in his own house, etc. She still used that same arrogant tone when TVS was talking to her about doing Rai at the engagement.
She could not stop her daughter from doing Rai and Sardhakai. She is the mother. If her 19 year daughter says she is going to do Rai and Sardhakai and won't listen to reason she had, as a mother, responsibility to stop her by whatever means necessary ' slap her, lock her in a room, tie her up whatever but not let her do it and then run to Adi to fulfil his vacchan.
She is a grown woman but cannot see the error in her daughter marrying a bhanja of a man she was suppose to marry and loves and live under the same roof. She cannot see how that will destroy a family. She cannot see that her daughter flaunting her relationship in front of TVS on a daily basis is not going to save his marriage, if anything it will destroy it even more.
She and Sugni have both forgotten all the things TVS has done for them even before he fell in love with Sugni. G is alive because he took her to hospital, G's Bhabhi Laxmi and her son are alive because he took them to his house for the delivery and stood up for her and her family against the Thakur who is Sugni's father. As a mother this is the values that she is teaching her daughter. If someone makes one mistake you forget all the good things they did for you and make their life hell by marrying their bhanja and flaunting your relationship.
To the writers ' please do not insult us by rewriting history or show scenes in hope that we will forget what has gone on before and support your current IMMORAL storyline.
Hindi TV Shows
Financial markets and global economy
