Rushali made ankita sign papers regarding something else, then she must have used her contacts to make it look like the papers were submitted at the time of marriage.
That's what I meant by 'fake' because they were submitted unknowingly without ankita knowing.
I'm not talking about whatever happened afterwards, not even talking about Ankita's lies or truths or half truths.
I'm talking about those particular papers.
If they are shown to be legal, then how can you prove them wrong? You simply can't because someone somewhere has paid a handsome sum of money as bribe to someone higher up.
Ankita does not have money to bribe someone to tell the truth.
The rape track evidence was easy because Naren was there on time with all the evidence. Plus DNA test of child and damage to Mansi's womanly bits and scratches, his DNA under her nails or on her clothes would have proved rape through medical tests.
All that can be easily proved. Especially because naren had all sorts of proof against his little bro, and he had money to pay for court fees!.
But what proof does ankita have of never signing the contract papers?
None! Her case would drop straight away and she would be accused of wasting valuable court time. It would be waste of time and money! Money she doesn't even have!
That's what I meant by fake, because they are fake to Ankita due to never signing them! And legal because Rushali bribed someone to make them legal!
I agree Ankita should be honest so that it's up to the other individual (Naren or Pari) to make up their decision on what to do.
I'd love for Ankita's character to go back to that unwavering faith she had in her honesty. But ekta does not know how to make consistent characters.