Mansi blurting out to Pari is wrong - update p4

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

978187

Hibernated

Posted: 11 years ago

#11

Originally posted by: Laila2009

What sin? Having pre-marital sex with someone is not a sin and neither is giving birth to an illegitimate child. i do not see these as reasons to have an abortion as long as the child is wanted by the mother. My argument is that Anitka should have a valid reason for keeping the child that woudl be more fitting with her character and the storyline - that she loved the child and loved Naren and wanted to keep it because the child was a part of the relationship, of a man she loved. She kept is because she loved him and it was a part of him...that's more romantic and touching than if she said she just didn't believe in abortion.

And Antikha's life is in a mess because of circumstances - NOT Pari...

very well said 👏👏

Quote

978187

Hibernated

Posted: 11 years ago

#12

@TM , i would not comment much on the current storyline because i dont watch this crap anymore. but yes what i understood by all this updates , i feel that its ankita's baby and she has the right to take the decision. but at the same time i feel that naren has a right to know about his child. no matter what the problems between the parents , but both should have a knowledge of the kid. i feel ankita should have said the truth.

regarding bringing in purvi , then i dont know what connection purvi has here. i am proud of the decision that purvi has not aborted pari due to the sake of this called ruthless society and some legitimacy. a child is a child no matter legitimate or illegitimate has also a right to live and be happy . just because a particular section of the society is considering a baby born out of wedlock and pre martial sex a so called sin , doesn't make this things a universal truth. period.

when everybody in this forum including MODs is trying to maintain peace in the forum by not dragging in purvi or arvi repeatedly , then i dont know what fun people get in distracting the topic and spreading unwanted negativity . i hope @TM your post remains safe😃

Edited by ashvikian4life - 11 years ago

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

xxxnm

@xxxnm

Navigator

Posted: 11 years ago

#13

Originally posted by: Laila2009

When the child is 18 years old, then it is up to the mother to decide if she wants to tell her child...in essence I think the child has the right to know who his/her parents are but unfortunately even good people don't support that - i knew a girl who was a child that Mother Teresa had adopted out and she did not agree that she has a right to know her birth parents or keep in touch with them. Your arguments are good and i am inclined to agree with you. Unfortunately, the tragic case is she loves him and wants to have a part of him - the child - at least I would like to believe that is the reason why she wants this child. I would loath the argument she kept it because she was simply against abortion...hence the reason she kept the child. I'd like to think she did it because she loved him and loved the child.

I would respect her more if she would have found a way to hide the pregnancy and ensure her family did the same, then try to get Mansi and Shashank to adopt it.

The mother teresa example is different bc she became the childs parents after adoption. She replaced and became the caregiver in absence of the bio parents. If someone loves you, they do not keep your child away from you for no good reason. And just bc she is the mother, does not mean the mother can keep the child away from a father for 18 years. That is not only reverse sexism but also parental alienation and so beyond selfish. That is awful and if some one did that to a woman we would calling them atrocious. A child is not a toy to be used to satisfy the mothers needs and wants. Decisions should be made in the best interest of the child, not bc the mother does not wish to deal w the fallout of the pregnancy revelation. A child belongs to both parents bc it requires 2 people to make a child. Men have rights their children too and the current custody arrangements in the Western and even parts of the eastern world are just exploiting men in favor of the mother, simply bc she is seen as the caregiver. That is a cruel and men have become depressed and have even committed sucide over this. (google Derek Walker Steven Cook, Darrin White) The notion that a woman can hide an existence if a child simply bc she carries the child is extremely sexist and prevents the progression of a civil society. How would you feel if you were a man and just bc the mother wanted to, she kept you from your child?

Quote

978187

Hibernated

Posted: 11 years ago

#14

Originally posted by: jenelam

I am not distracting the topic at all. I am posting what is totally relevant in the present track. I mean if pari only wouldnt be there in the picture then would this current mess be happenning. So tell me how am I distracting the topic by saying that pari should had been aborted ? Afterall the TM opines that ankita should abort the baby and not "milk naren" in the future. Thats why i replied that by the same logic even pari should had been aborted by purvi.

if that's the case then i can take every mother as an example that everyone should abort their child. if pari is the problem here then there are other ways to tackle it rather that questioning her birth and life . if that's the matter then every character has created problems for other characters , nobody is saint . so it means every character's mother should have aborted their child. abortion is painful for any women and they dont opt for it unless they have some problem . dragging in purvi again when MODs have said not to do it ,is distracting and instigatory only.

Quote

Laila Banu

@Laila2009

Rocker

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#15

Originally posted by: jenelam
So you want to say that ankita doesnt love Naren ? Well if she didnt love naren then she wouldnt had tolerated all taunts from his family. She wouldnt had taken the blame on her head and saved him from going jail. If this is not love , then what is the true definition of love? Would you please enlighten me.
Or wait a minute. Eating road side unhygienic food, especially the puchkhas, doing eye locks even if you and your exflame both are married to different people, dancing in the rain with your ex while your husband watches from away is the true love !! Oh yes I got it now !!

Just because ankita doesnt do cheap ott display of her love , that doesnt mean she doesnt love naren. Infact ankita and ovi both were ideal wives who even took the blames of serious crimes on their own head. Purvi and pari just want to use men for their own satisfaction.

I never said that she didn't love Naren. I said it would be a better reason to keep the child because she loved Naren and wanted to keep the child because she loved him and wanted a part of him and their lives NOT because she was against abortion...and that is the reason she kept it. As you note, there is no reason given for as yet as to why she has chosen to keep a child of a man who does not love or want anything to do with her and is ready to spend the rest of his life with someone else.

Quote

Tanyaz

@Tanyaz

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 11 years ago

#16

Laila, she did say in the mandir and other times that this baby is her pyaar ki nishani so obviously this is the reason why she is having this baby ..

Her calling this child the symbol of my love is enough to tell us why she is having this baby .

Ankita is going through a very tough time right now ..Her husband is always romancing another girl in front of her

She is in grieving and mourning for her lost love ...

At the same time she is trying to make money as she is not financially sound like Naren and Pari

The girl is keeping the baby as a secret ( I don't agree with her decision but I understand why she is doing it ) ...she is quiet most of the time and just trying to handle pain right now ...and take care of the child ...

Edited by Tanyaz - 11 years ago

Quote

soniiyaa

@soniiyaa

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#17

I don't feel pity for Ankita though. It's hard for me to sympathize with her. I lost that sadness for her when she lied in the court to Naren and Pari. She was such a strong charcater. She stood up for what was right. This disappointed me.

I felt pity for her when the whole Pari being Ahana came out and when Naren didn't recognize her. But after the lie - she paved the path for Naren to be with Pari. That was the point of her lie. Now she works in the same place as Naren b/c God knows no other company would ever hire her so therefore shes choosing to see Naren and Pari romance. So why should I feel pity for her? As an audience I can't feel sad for her.

Quote

ptecvish

@ptecvish

Navigator

Posted: 11 years ago

#18

Well, now that Pari and eventually all others including Naren will know, lets see what they do. That will tell whether she is right or wrong in hiding her pregnancy. And whether Naren will still need her in his office, as he seems to be doing now.

Im sure Ankita will come out of this a stronger person.

Edited by ptecvish - 11 years ago

Quote

noodle2808

@noodle2808

Explorer

Posted: 11 years ago

#19

Originally posted by: _saumya_
I agree . Everyone in EK's show is either too good or too bad. No normal creatures. Ankita is so much in love with Naren that she does not wants Naren to know about it but what about the kid ? bullshit. And if Mansi had to tell someone , Pari certainly was a bad choice.

I agree. She needs to be completely honest with him and tell him about the child. Hiding it is not being "mahaan" - hiding it is silly.

Quote

tannvi

@Badtameez_Dil

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 11 years ago

#20

Originally posted by: Laila2009
Mansi was wrong to tell Pari. That is Anitika's personal business and if she does not want to tell Naren that is HER right. And Anitika needs to stop pretending she wants to keep the baby for ethical reasons but because she loves Naren and wants his kid. OF course we will see the typical desi backlash of she kept the kid to milk Naren for money in the future and she will be seen as a cunning woman...EK does what she needs to do to make her jodis happen...
Pari will be a ruined character made to look selfish and bitter and Naren will leave her as a result. A better story would have been to have Pari mature and realize she was no longer in love with Naren - that he was boring and that she really liked another guy...I would have much rather seen a friendshi develop between her and the other guy...and then, as she gets to marry Naren, realize she much rather prefer the friendship with the other guy and that it is not Naren she wants...and then how to get out of the relationship...why does EK ruin characters to make other characters look better - especially when they are not that great to begin with - or completely unbelievable..

good point u wrote
why everytym repeating one same formula🥱

Quote

1 2 3

Wrong

Mansi blurting out to Pari is wrong - update p4 - Page 2

Related Topics

Explore Topics