Episode Discussion Thread -1 - Page 80

Created

Last reply

Replies

833

Views

98k

Users

54

Likes

1.5k

Frequent Posters

soniiyaa thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
I think cuz in the letter she says explicitly the baby is NOT Narens even tho she says its symbol of her love & she loved Naren only.

So that leaves room for people to speculate. One side you write Naren is only one you love and then write the baby isn't Narens.
nikitagmc thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: soniiyaa

I think cuz in the letter she says explicitly the baby is NOT Narens even tho she says its symbol of her love & she loved Naren only.

So that leaves room for people to speculate. One side you write Naren is only one you love and then write the baby isn't Narens.



No she doesn't.

I referred to Bhalla's update again. He provides sentence to sentence translations.
She said I loved Naren and still do. The baby is a symbol of my love. But Naren does not love me, and I don't want to separate Pari and Naren so don't blame him for anything. This is now my baby only.

She says she is freeing Naren of all responsibilities and blames for the baby, and that the baby is only her responsibility now. She doesn't say the baby is NOT Naren's. There is a difference between both the things. A normal person who reads the letter for the first time shouldn't have confusion or think that the baby is someone else's, especially when she has made it so clear that the baby is symbol of her love and that love is Naren's.
soniiyaa thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
@ nikita

She wrote something about her wajood and then writes " so how can the baby be Naren's?"

She herself is asking the reader how could the baby be Naren's? Whatever she wrote about her love at first is contradicted by her question thus causing confusion.

nikitagmc thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: soniiyaa

@ nikita

She wrote something about her wajood and then writes " so how can the baby be Naren's?"

She herself is asking the reader how could the baby be Naren's? Whatever she wrote about her love at first is contradicted by her question thus causing confusion.



She explained that the baby is not Naren's and only hers as it is one sided love.. she loved him but he didn't.. and so she has freed him of blame and responsibility and now its hers... picking parts of the letter will not help.. when one reads the letter as a whole u get it bcos she explains it all very properly.. she ties it up from beginning to end.

Anyway, we're pretty much going into the same convo we've had before. But my point is, the writing is very bad right now.. very very bad.
soniiyaa thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
I wasn't trying to pick the letter apart. I'm just trying to understand what people may be understanding based upon the letter who are regular people who do not know of the situation that occurred between Rushali and Ankita and the rest of the ordeal.

People are speculating and confused because she contradicts herself. She's expecting everyone to understand how amazing she is. Someone reading the letter will be like "okay okay the babys this guys narens cuz she loved him ... Wait wait now shes asking me how it can b? So everything i read thus far is a joke or untrue? So it isn't? I thought it was the symbol of your love who is Naren but now it isn't?"

Then she says the baby is only hers & she doesnt hold Naren responsible for anything.
ambolove thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: nikitagmc



This track would actually make more sense than the rubbish they are currently spouting. At least it doesn't make Naren look like an A grade idiot who is unable to comprehend what is going on.

Also as you said, we would finally be able to know what the real Naren is like.



Looks like Pari and naren finally had their suhaagraat.

Up until then I was still rooting for ankita naren jodi, even though Pari Naren have a good chemistry.

I don't really care if Naren does not regain his memory. Think he should stay with Pari now, I wouldn't want him to mess up another girls life.
nikitagmc thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: soniiyaa

I wasn't trying to pick the letter apart. I'm just trying to understand what people may be understanding based upon the letter who are regular people who do not know of the situation that occurred between Rushali and Ankita and the rest of the ordeal.

People are speculating and confused because she contradicts herself. She's expecting everyone to understand how amazing she is. Someone reading the letter will be like "okay okay the babys this guys narens cuz she loved him ... Wait wait now shes asking me how it can b? So everything i read thus far is a joke or untrue? So it isn't? I thought it was the symbol of your love who is Naren but now it isn't?"

Then she says the baby is only hers & she doesnt hold Naren responsible for anything.



Arey Soniyaa but she EXPLAINS why she said that 'how can the baby be Naren's', she says it in the moral sense.. she says it AFTER she explains that--> She loved him, the baby is a symbol of that love, BUT he doesn't love her, he doesn't even know when it happened so the baby won't mean the same to him, can it even be called his baby as he doesn't remember anything, he loves someone else now (her sister, she mentions that also) and she doesn't want to break them apart and therefore she is freeing him of all responsibility to the baby. It's like a flowchart, every sentence is linked to the first one.. that is why I said deconstructing the letter won't help.. any one who reads the letter will read it from the beginning and so shud figure out.. .. she clears it out that the baby is his but in a moral and responsibility sense it's only her baby.

People said Pari and Naren got confused bcos Ankita contradicted herself in the past, well, those people who read the letter for the first time, why did they get confused then? The two things don't add up. This is just shoddy writing, nothing else. Cv's think the audience will buy anything they will shove into our faces.
Edited by nikitagmc - 11 years ago
soniiyaa thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
People don't understand moral sense. They understand exactly whats written or said in a clear and concise manner.

Other people are confused also b/c the letter doesn't make sense in terms of the paternity of the baby. The contradiction is right there in the letter.

I'm not saying people are justified. I'm saying - Ankita doesn't make sense. So personally i don't blame others for still being confused. Even Pari asked her final time if this baby is Narens and u love him - tell me - i will walk away. Its simple. So many chances to just be real about what u want.

Why sit in a train station and cry and look at a picture if you aren't helpless? So many people have tried to get her right, even Pari has tried ultimately. What is the point if getting upset at others for not stopping your tai when she herself decided she doesn't want to stay. Why yell at society for what they're saying? I just don't feel sympathy for this girl anymore nor do I feel as an audience to root for her now. I'm disappointed.

You're right it is terrible writing. It always has been.

I'll leave it at that.

nikitagmc thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: soniiyaa

People don't understand moral sense. They understand exactly whats written or said in a clear and concise manner.

Other people are confused also b/c the letter doesn't make sense in terms of the paternity of the baby. The contradiction is right there in the letter.

I'm not saying people are justified. I'm saying - Ankita doesn't make sense. So personally i don't blame others for still being confused.



It was written pretty much very clearly IMO. Ankita made it very clear that though it was NAren's baby, she wasn't going to burden him with her and so it was only HER baby. I don't get what was so difficult with that, but fine. As always there is no end to this discussion.😆

I'll just clarify one thing though, when I point out about how stupid people are not to make sense of the letter, I don't mean to blame them for anything she's undergoing, that see, bcos they didn't understand the letter, she's suffering. (bcos I find plenty of posts which seem to interpret my posts that way) No. I've never meant it like that. She's suffering primarly bcos of her own decisions. I just point it out the stupidity as a huge blooper from the part of the CV's in the writing of the show, as something that makes no sense.


Edited by nikitagmc - 11 years ago
pch76 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
And now, there is a new article about a new hero entering. That is very cool, but is again from PR's recycle bin 😃😃😃.

Wonder what everybody in the clan will say be it Karmarkars or Deshmuks or Mahatres when they come to know that Naren knew all the time that Ankita is in Varanasi.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".