Originally posted by: bitasta
Falling in love is a crime...
NO.. falling is love is not a crime but falling in love with your sister's fiance is surely not good, atleast you cant expect us to think of her as a mahaan devi...
When she initailly fell in love with arjun, I dont hold her responsible for that, as she dint know arjun and ovi's marraige has been decided.. so at that point of time, ONLY ARJUN is responsible and not purvi...
But later even after knowing the truth still she went ahead to marry arjun, that was wrong.
Making love with the man one is supposed to wed in the next couple of days is a crime... I was thinking it could be good or bad, right or wrong depending upon ones' ideologies but CRIME???
I think thats theirs personal choice and its not something very good but ya agreed since they were about to marry may be we can justify their actions.
but after doing it... she threw him like a used garbage?😲 I know she did it for archana's happiness..
archu manav united because of teju's truth.. even purvi knew it then why this tyaag and mahantaa naatak?
ovi didnt know purvi has been intimate with arjun but Purvi knew, so she could have told ovi everything...
Same with moving out of town to save her sister's marriage or hiding her shame ( depending upon one's like or dislike for the character)... Although she was not present in Arjun and Ovi's married life, but of course Ovi was stressed, guzzled bottle after bottle with a DELIBERATE intentions of harming her fetus... but yeah Purvi was remote controlling Arjun as well as Ovi's actions... It was a CRIME that Purvi did..Seriously???
I think her leaving the town was for saving her face but ya agreed may be it is due to dislike for the character..😕
but purvi did interfere in arOvi's married life...
Now coming to the actual crime Purvi had done:
1) Child Swapping : It was a crime agreed... Although I like the character I would not even argue that she was a post partum female and was high on hormones ( although it is often used logic to defend some other character). According to PR she did it to protect Arjun and Ovi's married life... But it was crime nevertheless.
yes.. she did it for ArOvi but it is crime ...agreed
2) Sheltering Soham : It was a crime again.. Arjun took the blame and got punished in Purvi's stead... According to PR Purvi became an emotional fool and gave in to Soham's emotional blackmail...
agreed
Raunaq deliberately stalked and raped Mansi.. It was neither an act of protecting someone or yielding in to somebody's emotional blackmail...
yes fully agree...and well said..👏
Even Indian Judicial system has recognized rape as a crime befitting death penalty... But is the same punishment meted for falling in love, making love with man a couple of days before getting married or having child out of wedlock??? Normal choices that women across the continents make but is labeled a CRIME when a fictional character Purvi did... Until it is a TALIBAN regime we are talking about the answer is a "No" I guess...
no.. it is not a "crime" in actual sense, but it is grave mistake ...
Again child swapping and sheltering a criminal are punishable by law.. But do these crime fetch death penalty like rape??? I don't think so..
who said about death penalty..? i only said she should be punished for sheltering criminla and other crimes which I listed...I think u misunderstood me..😕
So Raunaq's crime befitting a death penalty is milder compared to all the crimes Purvi has done??? ### Speechless
NO.. not at all.. only a rapist is responsible for his actions.. and there is no serious crime as a rape..
And my it is Purvi's fault that Mansi was raped as she did not try to reform Soham??? What was all the gentle persuasive talks she had with him?? And again when she tried to do exactly that she was POKING her nose in Arman's affair. It was on them to actually try to reform him . Their duty DID not finish by simply bringing him home... But again Arman's failure as parents and it repercussions are Purvi's fault.. GREAT.
CID
Music Corner
