Arjun is an aweful father:Mod note pg14&17 - Page 10

Originally posted by: peachesnplums

Bashing real people - please please please show me an example of it?

You'll be surprised to see who had targeted whom. There were comments passed on economic status of real users of this forum - aka us!

Clearly don't understand bashing if you think you were bashed 😕

Bash us and then cry foul yourself, great!!

Originally posted by: pari-kirloskar

who bashed u?????????

unneccesarily u all targetted me...😭

poor souls is plural - so it was addressed to me and Nura, unless there were invisible posters in this thread then!

Originally posted by: peachesnplums

poor souls is plural - so it was addressed to me and Nura, unless there were invisible posters in this thread then!

Originally posted by: FlawlessAshvik

You called us 'poor souls'

http://dictionary.sensagent.com/poor%20soul/en-en/

poor soul (n.)

poor bas***d, poor bugger, poor devil, wretch

bas***d means..

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/bas***d

bas***d (bstrd)

n.

1. A child born out of wedlock.

2. Something that is of irregular, inferior, or dubious origin.

3. Slang A person, especially one who is held to be mean or disagreeable.

adj.

1. Born of unwed parents; illegitimate.

2. Not genuine; spurious: a bas***d style of architecture.

3. Resembling a known kind or species but not truly such.

So basically you called us a poor child wed out of wedlock. You brought our parents in this, you bashed them accused them and you say you have not bashed us WOAH!! 👏 👏

Originally posted by: pari-kirloskar

yes i said poor souls but not in the way u have mentioned. it was nothing to do with u both.

u are twisting my words very cleverly.

but you quoted us and said it, and you say it had nothing to do with us 😕

so you are not only saying I misunderstood your post but now also accusing me of some devious intent with twisting your words? You can misunderstand my/our posts, but same courtesy cannot be extended to us? why? second class citizen treatment?

Here's the thing - you've to be clear when you quote us - that while you're quoting us, you're talking about some third or fourth party - that could clear things up!

@pari-kirloskar

Originally posted by: onirfans

So basically you called us a poor child wed out of wedlock. You brought our parents in this, you bashed them accused them and you say you have not bashed us WOAH!! 👏 👏

Calling us dukhi aatma is not getting personal??!!!??

and yet we aren't even the ones crying foul about getting personal, or bashed or targeted!!

Originally posted by: bitasta

@ Bold : And who are you to judge us?

How do you even know whether we are Dukhi aatma or Sukhi aatma?

Do you know us? Have we ever met ?

Or have you been appointed to make judgement at the fellow Forum members who have a different POV than yours? Just because a person have a different POV than yours, he/she becomes a Dukhi Aatma?... GREAT. Anything else?

And as you have yourself said, since a word have can have a numerous meanings some of which are even derogatory, why not show the basic DECENCY of cross checking twice before making such comments?