Ovi is so fake:Mod note pg17&22 - Page 9

Originally posted by: onirfans

Naava said: "What i am trying to say is that as much as Arman disowned Ovi, Ovi also disowned her parents. It went both ways. She had a responsibility to Pia to give her grandparents. Ovi is a mother now, and she didn't take her responsibility for the child to provide a family. She clearly chose to be alone, even before the misunderstanding."

@ blue before misunderstanding why she choosed to be alone that all know...she couldnot forget Arjun but could not able to see her sister betrayal and her husbands illegel child infront of her and could not stay in same roof where always purvi tried to poke her nose in her life ...so for taking time she went to canada but all took advatange of her absence ...onir took advantage and put purvi free, arjun took advantage and interfere in punir's life, purvi in full form took advantage of ovi's absence to close arjun and archana took advantage reunite arvi...so what could she do ?

ahe tried to stay when her family need her and at that time she pretend to be happy also but how many days...

in this same situation purvi did not forgive arjun and ovi for 20 years due to her judge mental nature but ovi 's situation was more sensitive than the purvi...then how every one expected she could be forgave arvi in easily...

that good point is after betrayal and divorce she tried to make all relationship normal but after divorce arjun was dead for purvi...

@ red: yes she has responsibility to gave pia' grandparents...but its not only grandparents but also a father...but she could not ...in one way she is unfair to pia but not with anyone...

Originally posted by: sweet_tania

i know blue part was before misunderstanding... if ovi wanted to seperate herself than just becoz of immaturity?? ovi is living in hotel in place of with father nd parents failed to convince her to stay with them so its just immaturity???if u are happy by this than you should stay in hotel than i will not stop u this was archana's dialog... i guess we all know main reasons to distance herself from parents.

just becoz of immaturity this all things and detached process can't possible.

regarding disown process than it was first step from parent's side to disown one child for other's sake.regarding ovi's duty as mother than if ovi's her mother failed to fulfill her duty of investigation or asking question than how can ovi fulfill responsibility to provide her child a family .its not arjun who had chosen ovi over purvi it was armaan who had chosen purvi over ovi.

Originally posted by: naava

@ blue before misunderstanding why she choosed to be alone that all know...she couldnot forget Arjun but could not able to see her sister betrayal and her husbands illegel child infront of her and could not stay in same roof where always purvi tried to poke her nose in her life ...so for taking time she went to canada but all took advatange of her absence ...onir took advantage and put purvi free, arjun took advantage and interfere in punir's life, purvi in full form took advantage of ovi's absence to close arjun and archana took advantage reunite arvi...so what could she do ?

ahe tried to stay when her family need her and at that time she pretend to be happy also but how many days...

in this same situation purvi did not forgive arjun and ovi for 20 years due to her judge mental nature but ovi 's situation was more sensitive than the purvi...then how every one expected she could be forgave arvi in easily...

that good point is after betrayal and divorce she tried to make all relationship normal but after divorce arjun was dead for purvi...

@ red: yes she has responsibility to gave pia' grandparents...but its not only grandparents but also a father...but she could not ...in one way she is unfair to pia but not with anyone...

Originally posted by: sweet_tania

agree with it no child is illegal as child is god's gift...agree with ur that point too that pari was conceived before anyone ever dreamt of arovi ... but most illegal thing is to replace ur child with other's (just u r feeling that ur this move makes others happy can't change anything ...crime remains crime )... whether its ovi or purvi no woman can tolerate her husband's child with other woman so both woman walk out from arjun's life but purvi made it more spicy by exchanging pari with ovi's dead baby nd by hiding this from ovi...ovi was also having pia but never add spices by requesting purvi to accept her child after arvi marriage so pia also can get father's love which was once upon a time done by purvi after arovi marriage...this spices which add by purvi was not good or acceptable.

Originally posted by: naava

But you see the point is that Archana & Manav WANTED Ovi to stay with them, but because Ovi is a pretty stubborn girl who does what she likes, and no one can dissuade her, any parent would say to the adult child...we want you here, but if you would rather stay in the hotel, we will not stop you, That is called respecting the wishes of another person. That is loving the other's desires more than your own. Or in this case, there was never any point in arguing with Ovi, she always did just what she wanted to regardless of any attempt to dissuade her. Maybe for protective reasons, but never the less, that's what has always been shown.

If my parents disowned me for a wrong reason I would move heaven and earth to correct the mistake. If my parents disowned me for something i actually did, i would ask their forgiveness and move heaven and earth to try to re-establish the relationship. Once a child is an adult, the responsibility of the child to the parent is the bigger one. Yes, Archana failed in her duty as a mother not to investigate. Ovi failed in her duty as a daughter not to correct the misunderstanding.

I don't understand this idea that only one side is to blame in all these issues. Both and all sides are to blame.

Originally posted by: sweet_tania

if we consider that archana nd ovi both failed in their duty of explanation than who is more responsible for disown process?? parent who simply disown child with misunderstanding or child who failed to convince parents for innocence????specially when punishment is of 20 years disown process. its not about one sided blaming... for you its child fault for failed to convince parent and for me its parents fault to disown innocent child with misunderstanding..if child failed to prove innocence that also doesn't mean to disown one child for other child's sake.

for blue point :- if its just a matter of respecting wishes than if purvi had ever asked her that she will live alone after separation than she will allow purvi for same thing???? no..mother who can cry for one daughter 's pain that same mother can't feel guilt or bad for other daughter's pain.

if as a adult i told my mother that i will live in hotel becoz of problems with my sister than my mother will never going to allow me for this...Do thappad laga kai or lamba lecture deke ghar mai ghar mai betha degi...but asi space or freedom kabhi nai degi .becoz she feels that she is having every right on her daughter whether m stubborn or not..agar mai ziddi hu to mumma ko double ziddi ban na ata hai...this is wat archana's mistake that never show her right on ovi.

she can tell pari firmly that i will not allow u to come between in ur parents but that same woman can't say firmly to ovi that i will not allow u to stay in hotel...at that time its all about space.

Originally posted by: naava

I said quite clearly several times it is the fault of both and all sides. It is not about one being more wrong than the other. They all failed.

I don't know what else to say. So...i'm out for now. We can keep discussing this ad infinitum but we will be just spinning our wheels. 😛

Originally posted by: devashree_h

Reduce the quote train members, it messes up teh pages and is against the rule.