The Mothers:Mod note pg7 - Page 7

That why I call who not like Purvi they are enjoy blame to Purvi unnecessary comment, use vulgar, nonsense, horrible, useless language. The way Purvi get horrible, & vulgar critic no character get this way comment. What the problem only they know. Same also Arjun. Here not CV fault but others fault only made by CV.

Hate or love never ignore our ARVI. This is ARVI magic.😛

Originally posted by: soniiyaa

@soapwatcher1

This is the issue I have. When it comes to Ovi... Its justifed by whatever means possible. Ovis history, psych, current mental state, her upbringing, her financial status, her class and finally the CVs are used to justify her mistakes.

But when it comes to Purvi, she is crucified daily for every little action. She is mocked for her being an orphan. Called a wh**e daily. She is given no benefit of doubt or cut any slack. I've also noticed when Ovi is criticized then BOD are requested etc. But when thats requested for Purvi... Well then a whole history of wrongs is given.

Completely unjust.

😲 Where has this happened?
I get it that people are pissed off at Purvi donating Pari and not listening to Arjun but what's with being called a wh**e or being mocked for being an orphan?🤢
I thought the whole point of her being an orphan was to show that one could also love someone that isn't blood related and she hasn't slept with Onir or anyone other than Arjun to be called a wh**e.

Originally posted by: soapwatcher1

So right.

I think CVs butchered the character of ArVi and the storyline a long time ago and then went completely downhill from then. I say this because the two characters were strong, independent and level headed in the beginning but now I don't see that in them. Essentially every mistake a character makes is to be blamed on the writers because they are the ones that create them. If something went wrong in a novel the author is to be blamed but since we don't know the exact authors I guess the audience just blames the characters because we identify with them only.

Originally posted by: soapwatcher1

If we can blame the CVs for Ovi's shortcomings as a mother, let us extend the same favor to Purvi and blame the CVs for any shortcomings she has.

Also, whether Ovi called the doctor to check on her baby's progress or not, does not absolve her of blame and of being an unnatural mother (courtesy of the CVs or not). No mother in the right frame of mind would leave her not healthy baby and abscond from the scene for months on end. Just not done, just not motherly, totally unnatural. If my baby was sick, I would call, come home, check on the baby several times even if it was nothing but the flu so cannot imagine a mother leaving her infant in a cold hospital environment with strangers (caring or otherwise) and taking off across the globe, not even within visiting distance if an emergency arose, height of irresponsibility is how I see it.

However much inclined one may be to cut some slack for Ovi, the CVs erred majorly in this. Even if they had shown the baby being in an incubator in India and not in Canada, and Ovi visiting the baby once in a while on the sly without alerting her family would have made the story line more believable. All the CVs ended up doing was making Ovi look totally irresponsible and uncaring as a mother.

I would not mind extending the favour. Also, would like to extend that to Archu and all the other mothers mentioned. Though, I would still stick to my point on this being a vague thought. The CVs did not see the seriousness of the situation and how the audience would take it. It's happened before also in the case Purvi where they had some weird plot and the audience blamed the character for everything that went wrong.

And I would have to agree to the point that the baby could have been in India. Though then she shouldn't have been an incubator...maybe just show the baby being healthy and atleast a few months old being brought to India. Ovi then could have just taken care of her in that.
Though, the CVs have made all the mothers look irresponsible at some point in time, but Ovi is the most irresponsible especially taking in regards the whole alcohol part of it.

Originally posted by: -3raser-

Of course in real life mothers go and monitor their babies and I've seen my mom do that with my brother. However, in Ovi's case I felt that the CVs had just used that as an excuse to justify the baby's whereabouts and the whole facade in general. Perhaps because they didn't have anything properly planned. It wasn't something that they had put thought into obviously because they showed the nurse being there and taking care of the baby and made it seem like it was all fine. If the CVs had wanted to showcase that in another way, they would have made someone in the show question it. Also, how do we know if Ovi hadn't kept in contact with the doctors or the nurse and monitored the progress from India. Obviously, in real life this would be something no mother would think of doing. But then again, which of these PR mothers have done anything according to real life.
My point was that Pia being in a incubator was not something we are meant to be fussing over. Moreover, we should worry about where she is at the moment.

Originally posted by: Sakhile

Purvi may have raised her child alone but has she done a good job. No she raised a spoilt brat who is opinionated and arrogant. But yes Archana gets first prize.

Originally posted by: pallavi25

Really? Pari is arrogant and opinionated? And how did u deduce that just by watching her in 2-3 scenes since the leap?

If a daughter hates her absentee father who she knows has dumped her and her mother and living with his "other" wife and kid, can she be blamed?

If she hates the father who never cared for her, who never called her in 20 long years, to find out if she was living or dead, what else will she feel for her father?

She is totally justified in hating her father!

When Ovi and Teju were shown after the 1st leap, both of them hated Archana, their mother because of the lies fed to them by Savita and because of Manav's own hatred for Archu.

But nobody jumped to call Ovi and Teju arrogant and opinionated although Ovi showed much worse symptoms of arrogance and false pride!

Ovi was much more obnoxious in her behavior then than Pari is right now!

Originally posted by: -LiveLaughLove-

I agree with you Pallavi di! She may be opinionated but she is not spoiled nor is she arrogant. Whether or not all that happened in the triangle is right or not in my pov she has the right to be angry at her father who never cared to ask about her hal chal in 20 years, who never came to visit, never said a word to her at all!

How does this make her arrogant?

Originally posted by: pallavi25

Dislike for Purvi being transferred to her daughter, what else?

Still not know Pari future but after birth the way Purvi get abuse language this forum so surely she get many more abuse & vulgar language.🤢

Last week the way I saw Younger Pari some scene I not think she is spoil brat like ovi. I honestly hope that she will same girl what we see now.

At precap matter the way Pari talk to Arjun after learning whole truth She will be more close to Arjun. Honestly I want this.

ovi & teju not fault because they are darling daughters of manav baba & the way they hate their mother absolutely right but Pari case is different. Reason she is ARVI daughter.

Originally posted by: soniiyaa

Its is very important for a new mother to remain with her premie in the hospital.

The premie will grow and get better with the colostrum and breast milk of the mommy. Skin to skin contact between the mother and premie improves the condition of the baby. Bonding is also very very important. The amazing nurses in the NICUs can only do so much but they can't replace the actual mother.

God forbid something goes wrong or a certain procedure needs to be performed... The mother should and would be there.