Originally posted by: ilovepyaar
Not saying it's good/bad, but people have their own tastes. Just because you want to see a show with not an ounce of misery doesn't mean that nobody does. I won't lie, I do enjoy watching Ekta shows. PR because it's laughable. But my first Ekta show was KZK and man I loved that show (and still do) with my life. The amount of times I cried yet I loved it is amazing. It's still completely stupid like other Ekta shows, but for me, it had that factor that made me cry for the character's, yet I loved the separations. Maybe if I wasn't so young, I would have found KZK laughable too. Other than that, I haven't loved Ekta shows.
I love separation in shows, even in my favourite show, I always longed for the couple to be separated. Not with stupid misunderstandings, but events that will cause their love to get stronger. I love sad tracks. It's all a personal choice, I don't understand why you're assuming things just because of my preferences. I write too. I generally can't bring myself to write anything happy. I love torturing character's in my stories. Why? Because it makes me enjoy writing, not because I'm heartless.
Who's causing these arguments? I never said Ovi was real. I won't bother defending her either unless I feel like debating. Even then, I don't go around bashing anyone. As if I'm intentionally twisting episode facts to prove a point. I haven't twisted anything. Even after Ovi gave birth, Purvi could have taken Onir and left. But no, she had to be there. If Purvi gave up Pari, then why go around breastfeeding her behind Ovi's back, why trying to use her rights as Pari's biological mother? I haven't said anything wrong, I don't know what you consider twisting. And twisting facts does not equal to bashing. Show me one dictionary where it says that it does.
Why does Purvi have to "let" Ovi loser her child. If Ovi lost her child, it would have been Ovi's own fault, not Purvi's. She forced her husband and her sister into doing something they did not want to do. Why? They're grown people, capable of making their own decisions. Why did she need to interfere? ArMaan could have spoken to Onir if they wanted. They requested Purvi to speak to him, but I'm sure that Purvi could have told them he wasn't interested, and she can't force him they wouldn't have been able to do anything either.
It's funny how this conversation is pretty much all about what Purvi did because you keep finding ways to justify everything she does because she's according to the logic I'm getting from your post, Purvi is so perfect.