Pavitra Rishta Written Update 27th September 2013 - Page 3

Originally posted by: Tanyaz

As for DK protecting Purvi, that was so sweet .DK is a nice father in law .He was so sweet to Ovi as well and he is also being very nice to Purvi ...Though I would have liked it a lot if DK had told Purvi ( in private ) that she HAS to stay away from Soham as what she did was wrong and Soham is a very dangerous person to mix with ...It can endanger her family ...

Purvi was still going on and on about how nice Soham is when Archana lost her cool and told her off to stop going on and on about her dada ...I think Archana was right to scream at Purvi for still trying to defend Soham ...

DK should also tell Purvi to stop helping a dangerous criminal like Soham and show some respect for the law ...

I hope DK stays close to Purvi and keeps her in his home , nice and safe and away from Soham and the rest of the family .She is safest at her own home now with her husband and her father in law ...

Let Archana , Varsha and the police sort out Soham ...

Originally posted by: pallavi25

Yes, Archana was right in yelling at Purvi but not right in pushing her away, not right in rejecting her when she was in need of comfort, telling her that she would never forgive her!

Come on Archu, you could forgive Savita for trying to burn u alive, u could forgive Varsha after she stole ur kid and kept him with her for 20 yrs, made him a criminal!

Compared to Savita's and Varsha's crimes, Purvi's was Nothing!

Purvi is only repeating Archu's mistake from 20 yrs ago, of trusting a mad/psychotic sister or brother.

And Archana was especially cruel in continuing her rejection of Purvi, her silent treatment at D house. Why didnt she do the same with Ovi when she did the deal wala marriage? Of course because Ovi is her own child and Manav's favorite! Whereas Purvi is not liked by Manav or Savira or other Deshmukhs so Archu can kick her out anytime shes angry with her!

Treatment shd be same with all children. If Archu didnt reject Sachin or Ovi even when they committed their crimes, why reject Purvi for every mistake? Obviously because shes adopted and not really accepted by Manav and Savita.

Originally posted by: ashfaque2012

Bold point say everything. No one say Archana has not right to anger with Purvi. But the way she treat Purvi & Soham & other like Savita, Manju, Vinod, ovi, sachin & varsha is totally different treat.

Originally posted by: pallavi25

Yes, ArMaan's treatment towards Soham and Purvi has always been different from their treatment of their other children! Manav has always differentiated between Sachin and Soham, very obviously favoring Sachin and mistreating Soham even when he was trying his best to improve himself!

Archana and Manav have both disowned Purvi and thrown her out of the family before, now theyre doing it again! Why didnt they disown Ovi when she made that horrible deal, blackmailed Purvi into giving up Arjun? Now ArMaan are acting so shocked because Soham is after Sachin's fiancee, what abt when Ovi was trying to buy Purvi's fiance? Why didnt Manav disown her, throw her out of his house?

Why didnt Manav and Archana throw Sachin out of the house when they found out he had plotted with Savita to separate them and Savita had forged Archu's signature on the divorce papers.

Savita and Sachin shd have gone to jail for forgery and illegal activities but both were forgiven! Why? Because they are Manav's mother and his brother's son!

Purvi didnt commit a crime herself! She gave shelter to Soham because hes her brother and she had promised to help him. Soham would not kill DK or Pari, he hit Sachin because he hates him!

Discriminating between children only leads to resentment and hatred of the favored child by the rejected one! Manav has rejected Soham all along, favoring Sachin in every way! Soham was bound to lash out at Sachin, his hatred compounded by jealousy because ArMaan fixed Sachin's wedding with Gauri and not his! ArMaan have reawakened the monster in Soham, if they had treated this Gauri matter with more understanding and patience, then Soham would not have reverted back to Bisnu Lala again! ArMaan just pushed him into a downward spiral!

Originally posted by: Tanyaz

Originally posted by: Tanyaz

I have a different way of looking at this Pallavi .No one in this world is more important to a mother than her own child ...and Purvi is the only child of Archana who actually stayed with her for so long so obviously the bond here is exceptionaly strong .

Archana puts up a lot with Savitas behaviour because Savita is Manavs mother but in Purvis case Archana will feel even more strongly because Purvi is her daughter who put her life in danger , has put sachins life in danger and somehow has even put Soham in even more trouble .

Savita was hurting Archana but here Purvi is hurting herself , sachin and also Soham himself because of her stupidity ...so obviously Archana will be more angry ...

Purvi had not just done a mistake , she had committed a serious crime of sheltering a dangerous criminal in her house for so long and keeping it a secret from her husband .Purvi had endangered her life and that of her family .Now after Archana knows that she did this , is she supposed to put her arm around her and hug her ...no way , most definitely she should have pushed her and yelled at her ...In fact give her cold treatment ...do whatever it takes but make sure that Purvi stays away from Soham.

Savita committed SERIOUS crimes, Purvi's crimes are nothing compared to Savita's!

Purvi did not shelter a dangerous criminal for SO LONG! Only FOR ONE SINGLE NIGHT! Soham promised her he would himself surrender to police the next day. Next morning Purvi was trying to convince him to surrender to the police but he shoved her and ran away. The interfering butler had already called the police. Purvi wanted Soham to surrender himself as that would be better for his record, better than being caught while trying to escape!

Archu giving her cold treatment is fine but why insult Purvi in front of Gauri and her parents who are still guests in D House? Does a mother insult her daughter in front of guests or future sambdhis? Nope!

Archu is so busy doing drama all the time she doesnt care who is watching...thats why she slaps any family member in front of strangers! Weird and funny part was after Soham hits Sachin on the head, Archana keeps on yelling and slapping him but doesnt bother taking Sachin to the hospital, DK, Arjun and Purvi take him to hospital! Archu is too busy yelling and doing melodrama!

If Archana and Manav had called off the wedding, things would have calmed down and Soham would not be so despo to kidnap Gauri. ArMaan made a mess of things! Gauri doesnt even love Sachin so whats the need to continue with this farcical wedding when its only creating a mess in the family?

Then all the more Archana should try her best to stop her ...She knows how your sibblings can double cross you .Archana even said that to Manav that she knows that Purvi did this as an emotional mistake but Purvi lied to Arjun and that is terrible ...her mother is abviously worried because she would not want her daughter to have problems with her husband ..The poor guy had to spend a night in jail ..it was not just a small mistake . It was a HUGE blunder and the worst thing is that Purvi is still going on about how Soham should be given a second chance ...

Purvi never said Soham dada shd be given a 2nd chance, she just said Dada cannot hurt Gauri... that was what SHE believed as she knew Soham loved Gauri.

I feel that Archana should stay angry with Purvi till Purvi realizes her mistake and will not try to protect Soham .In the house Purvi was just going on and on about Soham and kept on saying dada this , dada that ...of course Archana yelled at her . Purvi is making a very serious mistake by trusting Soham ( I am sure she will realize this later ) and the person who should be strict with her about this is her mother .

Archana should not care about what anyone says , she should look after her childrens interest and that is to make sure that Soham goes to jail .

And... Soham is not her child? She doesnt have any responsibilities towards him? She is not culpable for his criminal behavior?