Ovi asking purvi - Page 4

Originally posted by: hillydee

How does Arjun and Purvi make a mistake such as having premarital sex and that is not done deliberately?

I keep seeing this all the time, and I am confused. How can you not have sex deliberately?

why everything Arjun and Purvi does that always have some bad consequences is considered not deliberate?

If you have sex before marriage without protection, what do you think would happen?

They both did this act deliberately not thinking of the consequences and if fate did not have a twist, the family would not know, because it would be only a day difference.

Ovi had a every right to ask her why she did not have an abortion when the baby became illegitimate.

Originally posted by: rajvta

The bold was an amazingly insensitive thing to write. The unborn baby it seems has no right to come in the world just because its mom's so called sister hijacked the dad a day after it was conceived. A baby's right to live it seems hinged on whether its mom got married the next day or not.

Purvi may be wrong on many fronts but I applaud her for exercising her right of choice in keeping the baby. She did not impose that choice on anybody, circumstances forced her to return or else she would have remained in Calcutta with none in the D clan getting to know the truth.

A baby should come into the world, where it is planned. I would never say the baby has no right to be here. It is the parents who have no right to bring them here under such conditions. If Purvi had planned for this baby she would not have had sex before here wedding day, what was the rush, why not wait for the nuptial night, when it would have been more meaningful. Also, after Purvi had sex with Arjun, who put a gun to her head to accept Ovi's deal?

Wow... no one here seems to be pro choice. 👎🏼 It should be perfectly fine that Purvi kept her child. Purvi said it herself, Pari was her only reason for living. It seems more people would have preferred her dead. She left the city, to keep shame from her family. Her family is the one that brought her back. If Purvi wanted to have an abortion, she could have. But as she said herself, she decided not to. She did everything to keep her self respectable, even married someone whom she did not love. Remember, in the beginning, it was not her intention to give up Pari, however, she thought giving her child to Ovi and Arjun would keep them as close as they were becoming.

Whether the child was planned or not planned...whether the child is legitimate or not...every child has right to come into this world.

😆

Originally posted by: pilli2000

. The unborn baby it seems has no right to come in the world just because its mom's so called sister hijacked the dad a day after it was conceived. A baby's right to live it seems hinged on whether its mom got married the next day or not.

Purvi may be wrong on many fronts but I applaud her for exercising her right of choice in keeping the baby. She did not impose that choice on anybody, circumstances forced her to return or else she would have remained in Calcutta with none in the D clan getting to know the truth.

This was well written

Okay, abortion is NOT killing a human - there is NO evidence that abortion's which occur in the first trimester is an act of killing, when the fetus is not even considered to be a living, breathing human. If abortion is a crime, then isn't it a crime for women to leave their eggs unfertilized every month? Isn't it a crime for women and men to wear condoms, because the men's sperm isn't fertilizing any egg? I don't want to get into an argument about the morality of abortion, because in the end it does come down to personal opinion, but you cannot claim that abortion is a sin when it is very much legal and practical.

For those of you saying a mother can never abort her child - you've been living in tv soaps. Get back to reality! There are SO many mothers who abort their children for many reasons. It's only shown in daily soaps that women will never ever abort their child. If it does happen in reality, it's very likely for that to be influenced by media.

If the fetus is in its first trimester [(even after sometime into the second trimester... (it can't even feel pain until its 8th month by the way for those of you who think it'll hurt the child)] and it isn't living, it would be more logical and practical to terminate the pregnancy rather than going ahead with it, and just creating problems in everyone's lives later on. The mahaan Purvi who sacrifices everything for her family got caught up in a web of emotions for her unborn child? Where were those emotions when you gave Arjun up? Where were those emotions when you left your mother, your family? Why didn't you get caught up in your emotions then? You were able to sacrifice your whole "life" as you claimed. Then why couldn't you sacrifice this fetus either. I mean this was your "life" too right?

I don't think this is about prolife vs pro choice

It's about being asked to abort the baby bc it would have spared arovi happiness and its illegitimate