I am so taken with your conscientious fairness that I would grant you most of the things you have written about here. I accept your take on Ovi as that it is yours, and in any case I do not care that much about her anyway.
But I would not grant you all. I do not like Purvi because I do not like people who go about deciding what is best for others - that it inevitably backfires is a separate issue- and in the process completely taking for granted those who care for them beyond all limits. They do not make sacrifices, they make human sacrifices, and then label that bhalayi.
It is like saying that she made a desert and called it peace. The fact is that behind all this tyaag is a deliberate choice she makes each time, the choice of one person or thing over the other because she cares more for the first.
On the hilltop, Purvi chose Archana over Arjun, and her subsequent sophistry in saying she did that for Ovi is hogwash.
Then she chose Sulochana, or rather Sulochana's pavitra ghar, over Onir's career, in fact his life.
As regards Pari, she chose Arjun-Ovis' marriage, based in her own reading of what would happen if the truth came out, over her own maternal instincts, out of a sense of guilt for what she had done to Arjun. But she will never complete the loop and take herself off to Kolkata, leaving them in peace, and if she had, none of this would have happened.
Please do not cite the very ugly golddigger act Archana put on at Punni's saakarpuda, statedly to prove to Sachin that she loves him. The collateral damage ratio there was 4 to1, Manav., Teju, Ovi and even Purvi on the one side, who all lost heavily due to Archana's mahaan tyaag stunt, vs Sachin, who still despised her, who gained. That is a worse collateral damage ratio that for the US troops in Afghanistan.
Archana, Vasu, is no model for anyone to follow, not only during the above incident, and even more so during that awful fake chawl demolition case where she sided with the the fraudulent chawlwallahs against a beloved and very caring husband of several years, who kept on assuring her of his innocence. That Manav did not land in jail for years was pure fluke, as one of the chawlwallahs rediscovered his conscience and retracted the accusation. Archan had testified against Manav already. I lost all respect for her then, and I have never had any ever since.
It is the same with Purvi. If you make sacrifices, you make them and then walk away, You do not hang around and keep interfering in the affairs of the beneficiaries. That is hypocrisy, not tyaag, and the funny thing is that Purvi NEVER, but never acknowledges, even to herself, that she alone is responsible for all that has happened, Hamara decision, my foot!!
I also notice that you have had nothing to say about the way she is treating Onir, both as regards the impact of the professional harakiri she has brought down on him, and even more so about her utter insensitivity during that bedroom scene with Arjun, which was obviously acutely humiliating for him.
The fact is that whatever else Purvi might be, she is NOT a good wife, an ardhangini, in any sense of the term. She is nothing but an endless taker as far as Onir is concerned, and that he is ready and willing to be used changes nothing as far as her ingratitude is concerned. In her place, I would not have been able to sleep at night worrying about what I had done to him, and about what he would do now and how he would cope.
But all that she does , when he is hungry and wants to eat, is to stand next to the window with a face like Job's, moping that she misses Pari. Some wife, this! The duties or a wife are not limited to making good chai and hugging your spouse because you are happy. Forget about the wife part, even as a friend, how is it that she carries on the way she does when he is slowly disintegrating ? He is looking more and more pathetic by the day, but she has no eyes for that.
But I repeat, that is 80% his fault. Kisi bhi aurat ko itna sar pe chadhana nahin chahiye. What Purvi needs is a Mittal-clone for a husband, and she would have come down to earth in a second, and with a resounding thud. What a delightful, if totally imaginary prospect!😉
As for her sacrificing anything for Arjun and/or Onir, why, she sacrificed the first, and is in the process of doing the same demolition job on the second. Sacrifice for them? Yes, if it did not affect her aai, her baba, her aaji, Soham, Teju, Ovi, and possibly Savita, Damodar, Vinod mama, Manju mami, Punni tai, and the household cat as well. I cannot be any clearer than that, can I?
Never mind, you are a very sweet kid and I don't mind your Purvi hang up. Have it by all means if it makes you happy. My son and I never agree on anything much either, and he is not half as polite as you are, my dear!
Shyamala Aunty
PS: As for the periya nattupen comparison, though that belongs in the serials by Lakshmi in the Ananda Vikatan of 50 years ago, and seems to have gone the way of the dodo in India today, where there are very few large families, I would go along with you on it as it was. But, Vasu my dear, surely even you cannot classify what happened to Arjun's life, and the meltdown of Onir's illustrious career, accompanied by strident public condemnation of him wherever he turns, as "All the little inconveniences"? Seriously?
Originally posted by: archis_2013
Aunty, I agree on most parts but in response, I have written the below. Apologies in advance for the length of the email but I have written in all sincerity and I am interested to know your views on the same.I will not go in detail on Ovi. Good that she has now got a career that will be her main focus, to which she can divert her motives and passion which so far has been Arjun and that has done her no good. However, I will not agree that she has grown as a person and that she has learnt from her mistakes. From the time I have started watching the serial esp after she landed in India, she has always been mean to people and asking her sorries later She is of the types who will not have any remorse in sending off pregnant ladies from their house and in the next opportunity, going and talking to them ever so casually as if nothing happened. I sympathize with her recent pain but nothing more. She may sound more real than other characters but doesn't make her likeable. If I am faced with such characters in real life, I don't know about others, but I will either ignore her or if I cannot, will put her in her place and ask her to take a walk,But like everyone else, she will grow up or tone down once a) she is more exposed to her work and public relations and b) she herself becomes a mother and be a good one at it. I have (and so will she) some of my shortcomings when I want my child to grow up as a responsible individual. Why else is the child father of man? Ovi is sensible to recognise this.And on Purvi, I had written in my response to Sowmya. She has to be cured of her interfering business. Yes, she feels that she has now the mantle to do balaayi for her family and has self appointed sacrifice queen of the family now that Archana is not in the vicinity. She has to be cured of all of this , not only for her near and dear but for her own sake as she has landed up on streets now. She has to hear this from Archana followed by a sound thrashing if needed because Purvi will only understand the message from Archana.What else would you expect from Purvi who has seen how Archana was longing for her family for 18 long years but was willing to go along with Sachin's plans of her divorce with Manav because that is the way she (Archana) could express her love for Sachin? How could Purvi act any different with such an upbringing?But that she goes around with a moral arrogance and does not recognise her mistakes is being too harsh on Purvi. She did believe that she saw love and vishwas in Ovi's eyes for Arjun (Purvi's monologue) and when she decided to give up Arjun, she strongly believed that the marriage will work out eventually. When she realised what a sorry state Arjun's life has become, she went to the extent of telling Bappa that she cannot be forgiven. When she heard from Ovi how much is the baby is important to her and her married life, she decided to give up the baby for Ovi's sake. That the truth was out and backfired doesn't mean that she is willfully destroying lives.Yes, Onir and Arjun has been the biggest losers in this game, but a question to you in honesty, if the roles were reversed and if Arjun or Onir had asked her of the same sacrifices, do you think she would have batted an eyelid?In general, unless one is a true blue sanyaasin, sacrifices will also impact near and dear - both in good or bad ways. Depends on whose views you are taking. For Karl Mark's wife to bury her dead child, she did it gladly as she believed in her husband's cause. But if you are Karl Mark's mother-in-law, you would see with blood in your eyes on what is happening with your daughter.I have often thought about what is in Purvi that makes me understand her. There are many shades of Purvi we see usually in the eldest daughter-in-law ( 'Peda Kodalu' in telugu/'Mootha naatupen' in tamil) of big families. They tend to go around being the self appointed care taker of the families , even with elders around. They generally tend to do lot of sacrifices and expect their husbands to follow suit all in the name of family's balaayi. They tend to get high-handed at times and lecture you on what is right or wrong. All the little inconveniences irritates the rest of the family but they are also appreciated for the general good that they intend.Thanks for being patient and reading through all of the above.