Written update: 13 Nov 2012 - Page 3

Originally posted by: rash2222

what is wrong with purvi... she has started getting on my nerves... i think she should know her limits of being a kid ... their are elders who can think much better than her... she should start act of her age and not like amma...

Originally posted by: Pancham101

What is wrong with being Sanskaari? Well, for one, you get all walked over on!

Purvi is not looking for a Mahaan status nor is she looking to get a Medal of Honor. She is looking to reunite a family member.

It was Purvi who burned down an important contract file just so her Aai and Baba could spend time with each other. This is so much more important that that. Purvi is so focused on getting Soham back in the fold, she is willing to do anything! Even considers lying in court. But, she did not...instead she stuck to the truth. Everything she said was true.

Soham took care of her, when kidnapped

All the chance encounters with Arjun and Purvi were just that

Soham did run the gundaas off

The others are being shortsighted. They all need to realize the truth of Purvi's words. Soham is a part of the family, good or bad. He is being misled by his foster parents, for incredibly selfish reasons. He needs to see the Deshmukhs stand by him no matter what. Blood is thicker than water right?😉

All her life, she has seen her Aai sticking up for her, even in situations where she, Purvi, was wrong. Archana stood up to Manju, Arjun, Vinay's parents, Punni, Ovi...did I miss someone? This time around, a conflicted Archana has been forced to choose Manav, in large part due to Soham's very public shenanigans. She thinks maybe jail 'ki hawa' will reform him. Purvi stands alone in her convictions.

The naysayers say ...what about what she did to Arjun? Someone had posted that Purvi gave up the only thing that was truly hers as the ultimate sacrifice in face of the gratitude she feels.

The bigger question is why did Arjun say yes...especially when he is capable of saying no as evidenced today?!

The only answer that comes to mind is ...the show must go on...

Originally posted by: naava

Pancham, i agree with most all of your post... everything Purvi said was in fact true. I didn't like it that she asked Arjun to lie or even called him about this issue. But she herself testified correctly. I think that this "owing" relationship that she and Soham have...brother and sister loyalty in a strange setting... is something crucial to the story. Soham now owes her again. 😉

Perhaps when Balan tries to kill Archu, Soham will intervene and save her, going against, probably even fighting against Balan. It will be shocking to everyone if that should happen.

Where i disagree. Balan and Varsha aren't foster parents. They are two people, one of whom kidnapped someone else's child and PRETENDED to be the parent. That's all they are. Nothing more.

In Balan's "defense", though evil in other aspects, he was not then aware that Varsha had kidnapped the boy. He perhaps has murdered, done his own kidnapping however, but that's another story.

Originally posted by: Pancham101

Yes, stand corrected on the foster part!

Regarding Balan , though...now that he is aware of the history he could do things differently...but that would mean having to give up a goose that lays golden eggs! There is no love on either Balan or Varsha's part, for Soham...

The only ones who care for Soham as a person in this whole convoluted tale are Archana and Purvi😕

Originally posted by: naava

😆 @ red. that's for sure...Vishnu lala is Balan's bread and butter.😕

I think that Savita and Sulo also care for him even now...it's kind of hard to know what to do, but Savita's advice was good. I am so happy to see a positive Savita. Makes the show so much more ejoyable and so nice for Archana to have her support.

I totally agree, neither Balan nor Varsha love Soham...only what he does for them - only for selfish reasons.