Laalchi, greedy shameless Sulochana... - Page 6

Well in Sulochna's defense she did it for Purvi and plus it was Purvi's engagment and they had no other choice. They were desperate

I want to give my opinion in this debate after a long long time because one point interested me very much . The money point .

dabulls23

why do u think that purple color and lord have mercy r ur copyright.

coming to the point. u bashing sulo is ok. but do bash savita also. she is not a saint.

i still think there is nothing wrong in sulochana request.
archu rejected it and sulochana understand and accept archu decision. full stop.
but If..i said if...savita requesting the same thing and archu reject it..Savita will get angry like the yellow angry bird and trying to plan something with her evil mind to make archu agree. This old woman never stop until she get what she want. Even have to ruin her son life. That's her natural. We've seen that many times in the show.

Great different between good girl sulochana and bad girl Savita.

So..if someone say Sulochana is greedy..that makes savita greedier.
if someone say sulochana is shameless..that makes savita shamelessier (there is no such word but i know you get what i mean).
Laalchi..i don't know what it mean..but savita is laalchier.

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

I want to give my opinion in this debate after a long long time because one point interested me very much . The money point .

It is often said that Manav's money is Archana's money legally and ethically as she is his wife .

I beg to differ here . She is a wife seeking divorce . She is not a normal wife staying with her husband . When she was she had full financial control . She used that money for fulfilling Sulochana's dreams by buying the Karanjkar house for double or triple the price...she used that money for loaning it to Varsha to buy jewellery , she chose not to loan it to Vandu as her husband was abusive etc . That time too I found her behaviour irrational but she unfortunately had the legal right . Ethically I objected to it . A wife does not ethically have a right to to squander husbands money on her maika . So what if the husband is nice and very loving . One does not deprive ones children financially to fulfil her moms dream . That is an understood thing . That was my thought process . If the maika has constant financial problems like the Karanjkars do a job and tell your husband straightaway that you will financially support them . Do a job and use your salary to help your maika... .no problem . I do not believe in turning your back on your biological parents . But once you realise that the need is constant ...don't milk your husband . Take responsibility yourself .

This is not a question of damad spending for sasural or bahu spending for maika . One must take respnosibility of one's biological family if one is so duty prone . Savita spends yes but Savita spends her child's money . She does not take a dime from Archana . She takes from Manav . Sulochana however takes from someone not her child . To fulfil her dreams , be it a house that costs 70 lakhs or Purvi's wedding or Punnis shagun Archana often reaches beyond her means and uses money that is earned by working hard by others ,

Now it is said that she has a legal right over that money as she is his wife . No , she is a wife seeking divorce and there is a difference . She can of course claim the money after the judge decides what is rightfully hers . The court will allot a certain amount to her if she claims it .She can pay P urvi's kidnappers the ransom amount , she can give Purvi a grand wedding , she can buy a wonderful house forSulochana ...she can do whatever she wants but after the divorce settlement which she has demanded . Till then whatever she gets from Manav is his goodness alone . Her husband is a gem of a man who pays through his nose inspite of an ongoing divorce when she demanded money from him publicly in a very ugly manner in front of all . If he decides to pay 3 crores for a girl who was adopted without his knowledge or consent it is his big heart . If he helps out financially in her wedding it is again his goodness . Let us not call his goodness as her right as it will be a long wait till and if she gets her right because make no mistake ...had it been any other husband it would have been a tough battle for the money . I think Archana is very lucky to have Manav for a husband.

Ironically all Archana's problems require a lot of money and can be solved by money alone not by sanskaars. For instance Purvi's kidnapping ... buying memories for Sulochana and arranging Purvis marraige .What I find ironic is that after critcising Manav as ambitious in open court and saying that he is not 'her' Manav after becoming rich , that she would love living in one kholi like before ... she requires crores and lakhs of rupees to solve each crisis that strikes her . This is often cited as her haq' . I find that ironical and convenient both . Here I am talking of what CVs try to show us .

Even the selling of all ornaments for Purvis wedding is wrong . Manav clearly mentioned that they had many memories associated with those ornaments . Ideally sheshouldhavedisussed with her husband before selling off her assets as a divorce is going on and yes her daughters Ovi and Teju ave an equal right over those assets . Whether they need that money or not is immaterial .

Same thing about those FDs . It is an investment made by the parents for the children.Sulo has no earthly right to say break Ovi Tejus FDs and give Purvi a wedding

Look at it from Ovi 's POV . First her mother sanctioned her would to be fiancee to Purvi ...now she is marrying Purvi off with money kept on her name . She will simply hate Archana and i feel Archana is right in refusing Sulo .

I cannot understand one thing . Arjun can give up his riches and live in a chawl for Purvi but Archana Cannot frankly tell him that she does not have much money for Purvi s wedding and that the wedding will have to be done on a small scale ?

Arjun will immediately agree . So will Purvi . What is the necessity for a big wedding when they can easily get married in a temple with selected people to bless them ? Was not the engagement a simple and private affair ?

Sulochana is closing all doors for Archana to go back to her kids and marraige if she EVER decides to . These are my two cents .

Why should Archana discuss selling her Jewellery with her husband who deserted her 18 years ago without a forwarding address.

Since I have missed some earlier episodes did Archana knew which city they were in Canada. So if Archana had no idea where they lived even if she wanted to contact her kids she would not have been able too

As Canada is a huge country.

In fact Manav should pay her more for desertion.

Originally posted by: TALIRAlinda

many member always say that purvi stole arjun, how?when arjun purvi fall for each other is that time arjun was engaged with ovi??no ,,so how purvi stole arjun ???

and now if arcna or sulocona want to something for purvi then many problem,,why??purvi also arcnas daughter and more than ovi teju,,,so why she dont sell her ornaments for purvis wedding if she need money??purvi has to right these ornaments as she is daughter and for god sake forget this adopted ,arcna not think purvi is adopted ,it is manav who think that purvi not ,,,,,so for god sake stop calling adopted ,,arcna consider purvi as like as ovi teju,,ovi teju purvi same for arcana,,

You are contradicting yourself dear...

Originally posted by: Kalapi

You are contradicting yourself dear...