Ovi said - Page 3

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Orchid

@_OrChiD_

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 13 years ago

#21

y there is a issue about purvis adoptation???purvi is arcanas daughter and all in all for arcana besides she is 18 years shadow for arcana ,,,,,,,,,,purvi didnt take racana from ovi,,,,,,,,,when whole family left india without arcana then arcana need something ,,,and that is purvi,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,every arcana fan aware about ovi that is arcanas bllood and they dont think that if purvi was not there then how she passed her life without family ,,,,,,,,,,,is anybody want that arcana pass her life lonely?????no right ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

purvi adopted by arcana ,,,and gave her name and gave a title and that is arcanas own title '''''''''deshmukh''''''''arcana has right to gave title to purvi deshmukh,,,,,,,,,,,coz arcana didnt divorced with manav ,,,,,,,,,,they r just lived separated ,,,so she has full right to gave that titale and adopt a baby,,,,,,,,,its totally legal,,,,,,,,,,,,,

and y there is controversery ,,if there is no problem with manv with that adoptation then wts our problem?????????

and ovi ,,,when ovi was missing then wrcana has same reaction ,,,no differene if didnt remember then again watch it,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,there is no kind of difference,,,,,,,,,,,,,yeah when ovi is back then arcana was not there but how she console her as they all hate her when she want to something then they express their hateness then how?????????teju she also her daughter ,,,,,,,,,she is ok now so y nt ovi?????

so plz stop that controvarsery about adoptation ,,,,,,,,,,,,,every wife has right to adopt a baby and gave her own name,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,its legal

as arcana bear deshmukh title then she has right to gave that name her adpted baby

Quote

aathya

@aathya

Rocker

Posted: 13 years ago

#22

oh for god sake stop blaming innocent purvi... archana only said that purvi is the only reason for her life if purvi was not there may be archana would have commitd sucide... and purvi is the one trying2 unite archana and manav.. the main reason for archana manav separation is savita... she made manav go 2 canada... she said alot of bad things about their mother 2 ovi teju so obviuslt they hate her... now archana is staying away from manav ovi and teju for sachin... so y u people r blaming purvi?

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Orchid

@_OrChiD_

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 13 years ago

#23

agree with u,,,,,,,,need to stop blaming purvi,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Quote

Kalapi

@Kalapi

Dazzler

Posted: 13 years ago

#24

Originally posted by: desicrowd

Using the same logic, Savita did take Tej and Ovi from Archu... If Savita would not have been in Manav and the kids life who knows out of desperation and loneliness they would have come back to Archana... Savita somewhat filled the vacuum...without Savita in the picture the story would have been quite different 😆...

Hmm…..I am wondering what vacuum Savita as you say was filling. She was a 60+ contented woman with well settle rich son, her daughter was married off. Does a woman at 60 really want to take the responsibility and care of 2 toddlers and a young boy? The truth is, no, she doesnot have to, nor could one want to. She never had any kind of vacuum at that point in her life…

Second, it wasn't Savita (oh I know how we could all love the blame her) who took the twins and Sachu from Archu. It was Manav who did it. In fact, could Savita by her own merit could go to Canada? Of course not. It was Manav who decided to go to Canada after Soham's tragedy to get away from it all. Yes, Savita didn't give that prized Canadian tickets to Archu, but in the long years with Purvi, she a very abled bodied individual never even tried once to contact Manav for her biological kids – isn't that strange and isn't this even partly because Purvi did fill the vacuum her own kids left inside her…sure it did…

Now for the twin coming back to Archu…does that happen in reality, they never knew a mother, so who will they come back to. Sachu who knew Archu never even was shown to 'want' to come back. Besides, in reality when a mom dies at birth, the kids don't grow desperate or lonely, they grow up normal, right? Kids are much more resilient and adaptable than a woman at 30+ yrs losing all 4 children at once…it is a different kind of intense grief…isn't this comparison a bit of apples to oranges as they say…

Quote

Kalapi

@Kalapi

Dazzler

Posted: 13 years ago

#25

Now for the Desmukh surname…now since a separated woman Archana still uses Desmukhs as her surname and decides to give it to an orphan girl, does that equates and translates that Manav's consent isn't needed, hmm…obviously Manav isn't a needed entity in this Pavitra relationship😉, he is only there to fulfill all Karanjkar's whims😉….hmmm I get it finally😆…his only goal in life to get mocha at Karanjkar's feet😉…poor soul…anything can be just pushed down his throat😉….

Quote

m_masti

@m_masti

Voyager

Posted: 13 years ago

#26

Originally posted by: Kalapi
Now for the Desmukh surname'now since a separated woman Archana still uses Desmukhs as her surname and decides to give it to an orphan girl, does that equates and translates that Manav's consent isn't needed, hmm'obviously Manav isn't a needed entity in this Pavitra relationship😉, he is only there to fulfill all Karanjkar's whims😉'.hmmm I get it finally😆'his only goal in life to get mocha at Karanjkar's feet😉'poor soul'anything can be just pushed down his throat😉'.

yes Kalapi, Manav is needed only for insaniyath sake, if he does good it is just insaniyath sake, if he does bad he is rich changed Manav

No one in PR sees the responsibilities that Manav took, archana makes him dance on one ishara

Quote

desicrowd

@desicrowd

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

#27

Originally posted by: Kalapi

</div>
<div>
<font color="#0000ff" size="3" face="Calibri">Hmm…..I am wondering what vacuum Savita as you say was filling. She was a 60+ contented woman with well settle rich son, her daughter was married off. Does a woman at 60 really want to take the responsibility and care of 2 toddlers and a young boy? The truth is, no, she doesnot have to, nor could one want to. She never had any kind of vacuum at that point in her life…</font>

<font color="#0000ff" size="3" face="Calibri">Second, it wasn't Savita (oh I know how we could all love the blame her) who took the twins and Sachu from Archu. It was Manav who did it. In fact, could Savita by her own merit could go to Canada? Of course not. It was Manav who decided to go to Canada after Soham's tragedy to get away from it all. Yes, Savita didn't give that prized Canadian tickets to Archu, but in the long years with Purvi, she a very abled bodied individual never even tried once to contact Manav for her biological kids – isn't that strange and isn't this even partly because Purvi did fill the vacuum her own kids left inside her…sure it did…</font>

<font color="#0000ff" size="3" face="Calibri">Now for the twin coming back to Archu…does that happen in reality, they never knew a mother, so who will they come back to. Sachu who knew Archu never even was shown to 'want' to come back. Besides, in reality when a mom dies at birth, the kids don't grow desperate or lonely, they grow up normal, right? Kids are much more resilient and adaptable than a woman at 30+ yrs losing all 4 children at once…it is a different kind of intense grief…isn't this comparison a bit of apples to oranges as they say…</font>

The fact is Savita had to take care of the kids at the age of 60+ or say 70+ as she always wanted Archu away from her son and get grand kids so he willingly stepped into the role of motherhood... No blames to her for bringing up the kids is any grandmother would willingly take cre of their kids in such situations... My only point is the logic which u have applied works both ways... If Savita was not in the picture Manav would defo missed Archu and for the sake of the kids and with the push of DK and Damo he wud have returned to Archu... Just a simple logic eh... Applies both ways...

Quote

CoffeeCake

@CoffeeCake

Sparkler

+ 5

Posted: 13 years ago

#28

Seriously this forum is amazing!

How on this earth purvi is responsible for all misdeed of savita? Infact she is the one who is like ray of hope for archana.

Never heard aayi from ovi always addressing archana as woh aurat and all of sudden she realized that she is motherless child?

Right now her mother is with her. Living with her alone. Every member treating her like she is criminal and no respect for mother and at the end of story all blame of purvi.?

Difference between purvi and Ovi is that for ovi her mother is woh aurat and for purvi no1 is important more than her mother...

Ovi easily said purvi took away her mother after spending few months with archana while purvi never said that now my mother is giving much importance to her biological children after spending 18 years..

Shame on ovi.

Edited by -ASTHA- - 13 years ago

Quote

m_masti

@m_masti

Voyager

Posted: 13 years ago

#29

Originally posted by: desicrowd

The fact is Savita had to take care of the kids at the age of 60+ or say 70+ as she always wanted Archu away from her son and get grand kids so he willingly stepped into the role of motherhood... No blames to her for bringing up the kids is any grandmother would willingly take cre of their kids in such situations... My only point is the logic which u have applied works both ways... If Savita was not in the picture Manav would defo missed Archu and for the sake of the kids and with the push of DK and Damo he wud have returned to Archu... Just a simple logic eh... Applies both ways...

somehow i am convinced that archana wouldn't try to reach manav or kids if purvi is not given to her...
only thing she would have tried to contact manav if she was in trouble like the way she needed manav help to save sulo's home...
and she never respected people who really helped her always played with their emotions and all the blame goes to savita and sachu...and archana is safe again...
somehow CVs ruined Archana character, she changes her colors like chameleon

and as you mentioned 60+ or 70+ savita can take care of 3 kids how archana didn't handle 4 kids not just 2 even before twins she couldn't handle sachu and soham

Edited by m_masti - 13 years ago

Quote

m_masti

@m_masti

Voyager

Posted: 13 years ago

#30

Originally posted by: -ASTHA-
Seriously this forum is amazing!

How on this earth purvi is responsible for all misdeed of savita? Infact she is the one who is like ray of hope for archana.

Never heard aayi from ovi always addressing archana as woh aurat and all of sudden she realized that she is motherless child?

Right now her mother is with her. Living with her alone. Every member treating her like she is criminal and no respect for mother and at the end of story all blame of purvi.?

Difference between purvi and Ovi is that for ovi her mother is woh aurat and for purvi no1 is important more than her mother...

Ovi easily said purvi took away her mother after spending few months with archana while purvi never said that now my mother is giving much importance to her biological children after spending 18 years..
Shame on ovi.

if archana expresses her love to Ovi and Teju, they will sure call her as aai...
if archana really missed her kids in 18 years she will never accept the condition of sachu, twins really missed her, in a girls life mom is so important, that is what they missed that is the reason of hatred...
twins never called aaji as aai so that means they missed her, and never they said they saw aai in aaji or shravani
but archana always said she saw twins in the form of purvi
it is really shame on archana how can she replace biological kids with adopted kid, rather than archana it is shame on manav who compared them

Edited by m_masti - 13 years ago

Quote

1 2 3 4

Ovi said - Page 3

Related Topics

Explore Topics