3/02/12 TV9:Punni engagement cancelled - Page 5

Originally posted by: ptecvish

I am very glad that it happened . And it is right that Archana is responsible for this even if indirectly.

Manju deserves all this and more. How many times she has wilfully plotted and harmed Archana in the past! So its her turn now. Her karma.

Manju and Vinod have kept Punni's past from her prospective in-laws. So isn't that cheating? Punni herself is not clean, neither is she interested in a middleclass marriage. So she should be happy !

As for manav, after treating Archana so badly, he simply changes his mind, comes in uninvited, lays claims to relations and shows off his wealth and expects Archana to fall at his feet and be grateful? Where were all these relations in the past 18 years?

Archana told him clearly that she will talk about it after the function. Did she invite him? One one hand his psycho-mom 's chela presurrizes and emotionally blackmails her and on the other hand the oh-so-simple husband changes stands everyday. im glad Archana did what she did. For once, she did not act mahaan even if it is for silly reasons. Good.

But it will not last. Unlike Manju, Archana does not get pleasure out of other people's troubles. So she will now try to rectify the damage. I think she will sign the divorce papers on the condition that Manav and she stay together and act as husband-wife till Punni's marriage. Bot I really hope that she gets her divorce in the end. She does not need Manav's money. She is happy in whatever situation she is!

Originally posted by: -varun-

tanya di...love you...😊..beautifully summarised and a very very RATIONALLY explained...!!👍🏼 Kudos to you di...👏👏

Originally posted by: -varun-

^^welcome tanya di...i hope you continue to give such rational opinions di...👍🏼😊..Keep it up...

Originally posted by: -varun-

tanya di unable to quote your entire post..tanya dont think im buttering you up...seriously what did you eat today? Im going FIDA ❤️😆 over your REASONABLE, RATIONAL and PRACTICAL approach towards different aspects...great! Esp @ bold : crisp and to the point analysis..! 👍🏼 i wanted to make the last sentence 'double bold' but there isnt any such feature..😉

Originally posted by: -varun-

^^welcome tanya di...i hope you continue to give such rational opinions di...👍🏼😊..Keep it up...

Originally posted by: devashree_h

<font color="#ff0000">Viewbie Note:</font> Varun, Please do not write the same thing again and again, if you want to appreciate click like button. This can be consideredspamming.

Originally posted by: -varun-

I uphold your views completely. In fact im very happy that you took my name directly and pointed it to me. I like it when things are pin-pointed and dont go merry-go-round. I also appreciate the fact that before sending me a PM you directly put it up here. Hence by the same logic, i put my grievance here as well. Hope you will consider it too.

I fail to reason why the member 'koolsadhu1000" has repeatedly quoted my posts just now. I have not quoted her posts in response to Tanya di's posts. I have not responded to any of her posts nor do i ever wish to respond.

Also WHY(extra bold) is a reference made by "koolsadhu1000" regarding THIS issue in KC thread today when some other member had issues regarding something else. Why are things getting so mixed up? You had clearly told not to mix things in different threads. Until yesterday 'koolsadhu1000" had no issues and now suddenly things have shown up. The discussion took place betw sharon di and "hillydee" in KC...yet she interrupted. Here too the discussion took place between me and tanya di(my post was clearly addressed to a PARTICULAR member and not members in GENERAL...pls take a serious note of this) yet she is quoting and interrupting and assuming things. I plead you to enlighten me as to whats going on yaar. Why dont people leave it to you mods to decide. Why do they constantly run to retaliate.

Your msg implies that one should not repeatedly praise someone and use the like button. Ok it was just a simple matter.Ok. I didnt know about this rule. But why all that quoting and inserting and interpreting things in other threads..?

Thanks.

Originally posted by: Dabulls23

Thanks Shruti for sharing..

I knew something would happen when Jhansi ki rani Archana created drama-nautanky in front of Punni's ILs and guest...Why could she not do all that drama in Private?

Also why did Manav have to go to Punni's function uninvited...Does not mean Archana had to be rude to him...Manav @ 15% fault

I blame Archana for the whole thing..She is 54 yrs old mother of 3 should know better how to act-behave in public...Not to air dirty laundry in front of strangers...Archu @ 85% blame

Punni will have now double reason to hate Archu Atya...I feel horrible for Vinod and Manju who gave ArMan untmost respect during Shakar PUda for Punni...

Shame...

No one should put this blame on Manav although he went there...Archana could have talked to him decently instead of creating the ruckus...😡

Originally posted by: -varun-

^^^prasad the above quote was addressed to mods and not u dear !! 😆

But your question is so funny that you made me go.🤣 so i will answer it for you.. -
you mean in KC thread ,is she the lone participant...arnt their other users? 😆

Prasad your question really made me laugh so much...🤣😆
thanks for making my day.